Ad is loading...
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$15.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$34.43
Change+$0.18 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.28B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 237B vs. PAARX (2.11B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (1.96) vs RLBCX (1.65). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (22 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (171.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.82 vs. PAARX (0.64). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.76 vs. PAARX (17.04).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.511 | 0.938 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 237B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.65 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.64 | 4.82 | 13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.33 | 16.52 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.04 | 32.76 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.12 | 50.74 | 44% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...