Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$17.03
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$38.54
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.74B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 263B vs. PAARX (2.32B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (3.04) vs RLBCX (1.46). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.62 vs. PAARX (1.62). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.95 vs. PAARX (16.13).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.481 | 13.744 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.32B | 263B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.04 | 1.46 | 208% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.62 | 8.62 | 19% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.28 | 39.76 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.13 | 36.95 | 44% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.08 | 67.89 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement