Ad is loading...
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$14.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$32.75
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.9B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. PAARX (2.01B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (2.48) vs RLBCX (1.69). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (22 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (171.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.26 vs. PAARX (-2.27). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.02 vs. PAARX (15.98).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.321 | -3.762 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.69 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.27 | 2.26 | -100% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.29 | 9.17 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.98 | 30.02 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.55 | 41.94 | 32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...