Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.19
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PAARX (2.27B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (2.81) vs RLBCX (1.56). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.61 vs. PAARX (2.95). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.26 vs. PAARX (18.17).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.146 | 9.537 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 1.56 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.95 | 7.61 | 39% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.66 | 28.47 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.17 | 36.26 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.72 | 63.18 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement