Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.95
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$37.73
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a StrongBuy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. PAARX (2.29B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (2.75) vs RLBCX (1.53). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.58 vs. PAARX (3.38). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.90 vs. PAARX (18.61).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.121 | 11.127 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.75 | 1.53 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.38 | 9.58 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.68 | 38.72 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.61 | 37.90 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.11 | 72.02 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement