Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAARX vs RLBCX
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$16.59
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
American Funds American Balanced R3
Price$36.95
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
PAARX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PAARX (2.25B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: PAARX (1.97) vs RLBCX (1.57). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: PAARX (23 years) vs RLBCX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBCX (0.89). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBCX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: PAARX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.89 vs. PAARX (3.95). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.80 vs. PAARX (19.74).
| PAARX | RLBCX | PAARX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.89 | 133% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.782 | 8.830 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.97 | 1.57 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.95 | 9.89 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.70 | 33.65 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.74 | 37.80 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.26 | 62.13 | 47% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement