Ad is loading...
PAARX vs RLBEX
PAARX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$15.75
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.03
Change-$0.57 (-1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.28B
PAARX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBEX commentary
Mar 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 237B vs. PAARX (2.11B). PAARX (1.96) and RLBEX (1.91) have matching dividends . PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PAARX (22 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (171.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PAARX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.13 vs. PAARX (0.64). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.46 vs. PAARX (17.04).
| PAARX | RLBEX | PAARX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.60 | 197% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.60 | 197% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.511 | 0.963 | 53% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 237B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.91 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.64 | 5.13 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.33 | 17.25 | 54% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.04 | 34.46 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.12 | 55.24 | 40% |