Ad is loading...
PAARX vs RLBEX
PAARX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PAARX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal R
Price$15.89
Change+$0.06 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.15B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.93
Change+$0.10 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.83B
PAARX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAARX vs. RLBEX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAARX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 238B vs. PAARX (2.15B). PAARX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PAARX (2.47) vs RLBEX (1.98). PAARX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PAARX (22 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PAARX (1.18) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PAARX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PAARX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PAARX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.12 vs. PAARX (0.88). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 41.10 vs. PAARX (24.00).
| PAARX | RLBEX | PAARX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.59 | 200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.18 | 0.59 | 200% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.924 | 2.239 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 238B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.47 | 1.98 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.88 | 6.12 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.69 | 22.64 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.00 | 41.10 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.40 | 54.40 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...