PAAS
Price
$36.22
Change
+$0.34 (+0.95%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
15.08B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
PMCCF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Capitalization
8.9M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAAS vs PMCCF

Header iconPAAS vs PMCCF Comparison
Open Charts PAAS vs PMCCFBanner chart's image
Pan American Silver
Price$36.22
Change+$0.34 (+0.95%)
Volume$3.61M
Capitalization15.08B
Peloton Minerals
Price$0.06
Change+$0.01 (+20.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization8.9M
PAAS vs PMCCF Comparison Chart in %
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAAS vs. PMCCF commentary
Oct 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a Hold and PMCCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 24, 2025
Stock price -- (PAAS: $36.22 vs. PMCCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: PAAS: Notable vs. PMCCF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAAS: 52% vs. PMCCF: 1%
Market capitalization -- PAAS: $15.08B vs. PMCCF: $8.9M
PAAS [@Precious Metals] is valued at $15.08B. PMCCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $8.9M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMCCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PAAS and PMCCF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCCF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PMCCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PMCCF is a better buy in the short-term than PAAS.

Price Growth

PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а -13.82% price change this week, while PMCCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +11.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4562.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($15.1B) has a higher market cap than PMCCF($8.9M). PAAS has higher P/E ratio than PMCCF: PAAS (24.98) vs PMCCF (14.73). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 81.349 vs. PMCCF (28.109). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. PMCCF (-1.45M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. PMCCF (36.3K). PMCCF has less debt than PAAS: PMCCF (340K) vs PAAS (821M). PAAS has higher revenues than PMCCF: PAAS (3.12B) vs PMCCF (0).
PAASPMCCFPAAS / PMCCF
Capitalization15.1B8.9M169,587%
EBITDA1.41B-1.45M-97,327%
Gain YTD81.34928.109289%
P/E Ratio24.9814.73170%
Revenue3.12B0-
Total Cash1.11B36.3K3,055,096%
Total Debt821M340K241,471%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAAS vs PMCCF: Fundamental Ratings
PAAS
PMCCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6981
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
76100
SMR RATING
1..100
685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4377
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9910
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5013

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for PMCCF (88) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PMCCF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAAS (68) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PMCCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PMCCF (77) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PMCCF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCCF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAAS (99) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PMCCF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAASPMCCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WTIU10.010.62
+6.60%
MicroSectors™ Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
DFJ93.250.31
+0.33%
WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend ETF
BETZ22.520.07
+0.30%
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
HYS95.310.05
+0.05%
PIMCO 0-5 Year High Yield Corp Bd ETF
LODI25.33-0.01
-0.04%
AAM SLC Low Duration Income ETF

PMCCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCCF and RRDMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCCF and RRDMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCCF
1D Price
Change %
PMCCF100%
+14.43%
RRDMF - PMCCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.73%
GROY - PMCCF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
SSRM - PMCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
PAAS - PMCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
NG - PMCCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
More