PAAS
Price
$33.92
Change
+$0.99 (+3.01%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.85B
75 days until earnings call
PNCKF
Price
$0.41
Change
+$0.01 (+2.50%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
30.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAAS vs PNCKF

Header iconPAAS vs PNCKF Comparison
Open Charts PAAS vs PNCKFBanner chart's image
Pan American Silver
Price$33.92
Change+$0.99 (+3.01%)
Volume$3.55K
Capitalization11.85B
Galleon Gold
Price$0.41
Change+$0.01 (+2.50%)
Volume$15.7K
Capitalization30.59M
PAAS vs PNCKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAAS vs. PNCKF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a StrongBuy and PNCKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (PAAS: $32.93 vs. PNCKF: $0.41)
Brand notoriety: PAAS: Notable vs. PNCKF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAAS: 81% vs. PNCKF: 34%
Market capitalization -- PAAS: $11.85B vs. PNCKF: $30.59M
PAAS [@Precious Metals] is valued at $11.85B. PNCKF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $30.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $83.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNCKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNCKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than PNCKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNCKF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PNCKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than PNCKF.

Price Growth

PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.78% price change this week, while PNCKF (@Precious Metals) price change was +3.30% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3358.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.21% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($11.9B) has a higher market cap than PNCKF($30.6M). PNCKF YTD gains are higher at: 247.235 vs. PAAS (64.877). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. PNCKF (-546.41K). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 900M vs. PNCKF (906K). PNCKF has less debt than PAAS: PNCKF (3.2M) vs PAAS (804M). PAAS has higher revenues than PNCKF: PAAS (3.12B) vs PNCKF (0).
PAASPNCKFPAAS / PNCKF
Capitalization11.9B30.6M38,889%
EBITDA1.41B-546.41K-258,597%
Gain YTD64.877247.23526%
P/E Ratio22.71N/A-
Revenue3.12B0-
Total Cash900M906K99,338%
Total Debt804M3.2M25,164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAAS vs PNCKF: Fundamental Ratings
PAAS
PNCKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2378
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNCKF (57) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNCKF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PNCKF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to PNCKF’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (100) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as PNCKF (100) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to PNCKF’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PNCKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that PNCKF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAASPNCKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNCKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LCTD52.400.24
+0.46%
BlackRock World ex US Cbn Tnstn Rdns ETF
FTIF22.200.09
+0.42%
First Trust Bloomberg Infl Snstv Eq ETF
FVAL67.650.20
+0.30%
Fidelity Value Factor ETF
RITPF27.10N/A
N/A
RIT Capital Partners Plc.
FCA27.49-0.49
-1.75%
First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF

PNCKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PNCKF and SAND have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PNCKF and SAND's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNCKF
1D Price
Change %
PNCKF100%
+4.16%
SAND - PNCKF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
NSUPF - PNCKF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.65%
PAAS - PNCKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
RCGCF - PNCKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
AGI - PNCKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More