PAAS
Price
$38.36
Change
-$0.45 (-1.16%)
Updated
Sep 30, 12:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.17B
43 days until earnings call
RMRDF
Price
$0.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
178.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAAS vs RMRDF

Header iconPAAS vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts PAAS vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Pan American Silver
Price$38.36
Change-$0.45 (-1.16%)
Volume$4.57K
Capitalization16.17B
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$665.98K
Capitalization178.68M
PAAS vs RMRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAAS vs. RMRDF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a Buy and RMRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (PAAS: $38.81 vs. RMRDF: $0.46)
Brand notoriety: PAAS: Notable vs. RMRDF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAAS: 120% vs. RMRDF: 142%
Market capitalization -- PAAS: $16.17B vs. RMRDF: $178.68M
PAAS [@Precious Metals] is valued at $16.17B. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $178.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $107.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than RMRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAAS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAAS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than RMRDF.

Price Growth

PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.85% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -11.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +29.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6148.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.87% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($16.2B) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($179M). PAAS (94.317) and RMRDF (92.780) have similar YTD gains . PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. RMRDF (-2.4M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. RMRDF (14.9M). PAAS has higher revenues than RMRDF: PAAS (3.12B) vs RMRDF (0).
PAASRMRDFPAAS / RMRDF
Capitalization16.2B179M9,050%
EBITDA1.41B-2.4M-58,868%
Gain YTD94.31792.780102%
P/E Ratio26.77N/A-
Revenue3.12B0-
Total Cash1.11B14.9M7,443%
Total Debt821MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAAS vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
PAAS
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2267
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7754
SMR RATING
1..100
6893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9885
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (17) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMRDF (95) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (77) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (68) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RMRDF (93) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's P/E Growth Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (98) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAASRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WFINX60.43N/A
N/A
Allspring Index C
HGASX29.62N/A
N/A
Hennessy Gas Utility Institutional
CCMAX9.57N/A
N/A
Conestoga Mid Cap Institutional
TAGFX11.42N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Growth R6
RDCEX15.55N/A
N/A
Columbia Disciplined Core C

RMRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RMRDF and NSUPF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RMRDF and NSUPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RMRDF
1D Price
Change %
RMRDF100%
-0.34%
NSUPF - RMRDF
29%
Poorly correlated
-6.71%
IAUX - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
PAAS - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
CGLCF - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.41%
EQX - RMRDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.10%
More