PAAS
Price
$34.60
Change
+$1.02 (+3.04%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.63B
65 days until earnings call
RMRDF
Price
$0.43
Change
-$0.01 (-2.27%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
147.99M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAAS vs RMRDF

Header iconPAAS vs RMRDF Comparison
Open Charts PAAS vs RMRDFBanner chart's image
Pan American Silver
Price$34.60
Change+$1.02 (+3.04%)
Volume$6.51M
Capitalization14.63B
Radisson Mining Resources
Price$0.43
Change-$0.01 (-2.27%)
Volume$222.27K
Capitalization147.99M
PAAS vs RMRDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAAS vs. RMRDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAAS is a StrongBuy and RMRDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PAAS: $34.60 vs. RMRDF: $0.43)
Brand notoriety: PAAS: Notable vs. RMRDF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAAS: 137% vs. RMRDF: 65%
Market capitalization -- PAAS: $14.63B vs. RMRDF: $147.99M
PAAS [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.63B. RMRDF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $147.99M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAAS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRMRDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RMRDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than RMRDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAAS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RMRDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RMRDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than RMRDF.

Price Growth

PAAS (@Precious Metals) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while RMRDF (@Precious Metals) price change was -10.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4920.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($14.6B) has a higher market cap than RMRDF($148M). RMRDF YTD gains are higher at: 79.983 vs. PAAS (73.238). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. RMRDF (-2.03M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 900M vs. RMRDF (5.86M). PAAS has higher revenues than RMRDF: PAAS (3.12B) vs RMRDF (0).
PAASRMRDFPAAS / RMRDF
Capitalization14.6B148M9,865%
EBITDA1.41B-2.03M-69,706%
Gain YTD73.23879.98392%
P/E Ratio23.86N/A-
Revenue3.12B0-
Total Cash900M5.86M15,361%
Total Debt804MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAAS vs RMRDF: Fundamental Ratings
PAAS
RMRDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9263
SMR RATING
1..100
8593
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9888
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAAS's Valuation (16) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for RMRDF (95) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew significantly faster than RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (92) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

PAAS's SMR Rating (85) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as RMRDF (93) in the null industry. This means that PAAS’s stock grew similarly to RMRDF’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (39) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

RMRDF's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as PAAS (98) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that RMRDF’s stock grew similarly to PAAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAASRMRDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RMRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EDVMF37.410.77
+2.10%
ENDEAVOUR Mining PLC.
IDCBF0.75N/A
N/A
Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Ltd.
RAFI3.80N/A
N/A
Regency Affiliates, Inc.
SOME58.00N/A
N/A
Somerset Trust Holding Co.
OVHGY5.13N/A
N/A
OVH GROUPE