Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBBX
PABAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$37.63
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
PABAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. PABAX (2.29B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: PABAX (2.92) vs RLBBX (1.15). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PABAX (0.93). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: PABAX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. PABAX (3.74). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 35.40 vs. PABAX (20.39).
| PABAX | RLBBX | PABAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 10.795 | 95% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 1.15 | 254% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.74 | 9.11 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.92 | 37.13 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 35.40 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.26 | 67.75 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement