Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBBX
PABAX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBBX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.99
Change-$0.02 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
American Funds American Balanced R2
Price$37.10
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets256.26B
PABAX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBBX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 256B vs. PABAX (2.27B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: PABAX (2.98) vs RLBBX (1.16). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBBX (23 years). RLBBX (1.32) is less costly to investors than PABAX (0.93). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBBX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: PABAX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.14 vs. PABAX (3.26). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. PABAX (19.89).
| PABAX | RLBBX | PABAX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.32 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.263 | 9.234 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 256B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.98 | 1.16 | 256% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.26 | 7.14 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.75 | 27.06 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.89 | 33.77 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.65 | 59.09 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement