Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.17
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.29B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.93
Change+$0.20 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.11B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a StrongBuy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 259B vs. PABAX (2.29B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (2.92) vs RLBEX (1.79). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.94 vs. PABAX (3.74). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.68 vs. PABAX (20.39).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.291 | 11.352 | 91% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.29B | 259B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.92 | 1.79 | 163% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.74 | 9.94 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.92 | 39.85 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.39 | 39.68 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.26 | 77.45 | 53% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement