Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.80
Change+$0.04 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$37.13
Change+$0.07 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets254.37B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 254B vs. PABAX (2.25B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (2.13) vs RLBEX (1.83). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.25 vs. PABAX (4.31). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 39.56 vs. PABAX (21.55).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.914 | 9.003 | 88% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 254B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.13 | 1.83 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.31 | 10.25 | 42% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.87 | 34.68 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.55 | 39.56 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 33.17 | 67.20 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers