Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.75
Change+$0.01 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.31
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. PABAX (2.11B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (2.71) vs RLBEX (1.98). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.73 vs. PABAX (-0.14). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 36.69 vs. PABAX (21.52).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.183 | 0.425 | 43% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 234B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.71 | 1.98 | 137% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.14 | 4.73 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.86 | 21.84 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.52 | 36.69 | 59% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.82 | 52.56 | 43% |