Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$15.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.01B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$32.90
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets224.9B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 225B vs. PABAX (2.01B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (2.72) vs RLBEX (1.97). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (171.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.55 vs. PABAX (-1.92). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 31.66 vs. PABAX (17.79).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.60 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.60 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.272 | -3.702 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.01B | 225B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.72 | 1.97 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.92 | 2.55 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | 9.93 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.79 | 31.66 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.97 | 46.29 | 37% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...