Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.30
Change-$0.15 (-0.91%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$35.57
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PABAX (2.18B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (2.62) vs RLBEX (1.90). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.25 vs. PABAX (1.06). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 38.29 vs. PABAX (22.81).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.702 | 4.423 | 106% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.62 | 1.90 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.06 | 5.25 | 20% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.25 | 32.58 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.81 | 38.29 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.71 | 59.72 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement