Ad is loading...
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$16.10
Change+$0.10 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$34.94
Change+$0.22 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets240.18B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 240B vs. PABAX (2.14B). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PABAX: RLBEX (2.24) vs PABAX (1.62). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (31 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 302.00 vs. RLBEX (171.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.28 vs. PABAX (8.42). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 29.82 vs. PABAX (13.39).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.513 | 1.955 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.14B | 240B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.62 | 2.24 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 12.28 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.02 | 12.34 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.39 | 29.82 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.38 | 58.04 | 51% |