Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABAX vs RLBEX
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABAX vs RLBEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal A
Price$17.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.33B
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$39.20
Change+$0.26 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
PABAX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABAX vs. RLBEX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABAX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PABAX (2.33B). PABAX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: PABAX (2.46) vs RLBEX (1.74). PABAX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABAX (32 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABAX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.59). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBEX (44.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: PABAX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.37 vs. PABAX (2.05). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 44.37 vs. PABAX (21.96).
| PABAX | RLBEX | PABAX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.59 | 158% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.961 | 15.396 | 78% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.33B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 1.74 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.05 | 9.37 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.99 | 50.92 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.96 | 44.37 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.63 | 75.73 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement