Ad is loading...
PABCX vs RLBEX
PABCX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts PABCX vs RLBEX
PGIM Balanced C
Price$16.50
Change+$0.16 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets920.26M
American Funds American Balanced R4
Price$33.06
Change+$0.36 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.62B
PABCX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABCX vs. RLBEX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABCX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 224B vs. PABCX (920M). RLBEX pays higher dividends than PABCX: RLBEX (1.97) vs PABCX (1.42). PABCX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: PABCX (28 years) vs RLBEX (23 years). PABCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PABCX (107.00). RLBEX has a lower initial minimum investment than PABCX: RLBEX (250) vs PABCX (1000). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.89 vs. PABCX (-4.97). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.33 vs. PABCX (20.25).
| PABCX | RLBEX | PABCX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.60 | 302% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.60 | 312% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.265 | -3.234 | 194% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 224B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 1.97 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.97 | 0.89 | -560% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | 10.36 | 31% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.25 | 35.33 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.08 | 47.53 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...