Ad is loading...
PABCX vs RLBFX
PABCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABCX vs RLBFX
PGIM Balanced C
Price$16.50
Change+$0.16 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets920.26M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.17
Change+$0.36 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.62B
PABCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABCX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 224B vs. PABCX (920M). RLBFX pays higher dividends than PABCX: RLBFX (2.26) vs PABCX (1.42). PABCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABCX (28 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 171.00 vs. PABCX (107.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PABCX: RLBFX (250) vs PABCX (1000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.19 vs. PABCX (-4.97). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.06 vs. PABCX (20.25).
| PABCX | RLBFX | PABCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.30 | 603% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 0.30 | 623% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.265 | -3.179 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 920M | 224B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.42 | 2.26 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.97 | 1.19 | -419% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.26 | 11.14 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.25 | 37.06 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.08 | 48.21 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...