Ad is loading...
PABFX vs RLBFX
PABFX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABFX vs RLBFX
PGIM Balanced Z
Price$17.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets962.49M
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
PABFX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABFX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABFX is a StrongBuy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. PABFX (962M). PABFX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABFX (2.43) vs RLBFX (2.26). PABFX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABFX (32 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABFX (0.84) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABFX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. PABFX (1.17). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.47 vs. PABFX (28.36).
| PABFX | RLBFX | PABFX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.78 | 0.29 | 269% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.29 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.714 | 0.528 | -135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 962M | 234B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.43 | 2.26 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.17 | 5.06 | 23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.93 | 22.75 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.36 | 38.47 | 74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.05 | 53.33 | 54% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...