Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABGX vs RGACX
PABGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PABGX vs RGACX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Advisor
Price$177.93
Change-$1.66 (-0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets60.92B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$72.77
Change-$0.52 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.2B
PABGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABGX vs. RGACX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABGX is a Buy and RGACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 298B vs. PABGX (60.9B). RGACX pays higher dividends than PABGX: RGACX (0.08) vs PABGX (0.00). PABGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PABGX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). PABGX (0.95) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PABGX (15.70). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PABGX: RGACX (250) vs PABGX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.70 vs. PABGX (4.60). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.14 vs. PABGX (39.14).
| PABGX | RGACX | PABGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.95 | 0.94 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.166 | 1.083 | -108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 60.9B | 298B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.60 | 5.70 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.48 | 40.43 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.14 | 44.14 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.89 | 64.02 | 233% |