Ad is loading...
PABGX vs RGACX
PABGX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PABGX vs RGACX
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Advisor
Price$159.79
Change+$2.97 (+1.89%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.89B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$64.89
Change+$1.02 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
PABGX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABGX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABGX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PABGX (53.9B). RGACX pays higher dividends than PABGX: RGACX (0.09) vs PABGX (0.00). PABGX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PABGX (25 years) vs RGACX (23 years). PABGX (0.97) and RGACX (0.94) have similar cost to investors . RGACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. PABGX (15.70). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PABGX: RGACX (250) vs PABGX (2500). PABGX (-5.63) and RGACX (-5.75) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 44.89 vs. PABGX (40.27).
| PABGX | RGACX | PABGX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.94 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.97 | 0.94 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -12.892 | -9.862 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.9B | 261B | 21% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.63 | -5.75 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.32 | 5.76 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.27 | 44.89 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.99 | 47.51 | 250% |