Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$16.37
Change-$0.14 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$35.31
Change-$0.31 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PABYX (2.18B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (2.85) vs RLBAX (1.23). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.45 vs. PABYX (0.45). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.05 vs. PABYX (23.35).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.928 | 4.085 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 1.23 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.45 | 4.45 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.18 | 30.02 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 34.05 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.37 | 51.23 | 59% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement