Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$16.07
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$34.49
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.69B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 238B vs. PABYX (2.17B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (2.94) vs RLBAX (1.28). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.94 vs. PABYX (0.59). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.77 vs. PABYX (24.56).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.214 | 1.685 | 131% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 238B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 1.28 | 231% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | 3.94 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.90 | 20.37 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.56 | 33.77 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.94 | 46.09 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers