Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$17.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.73
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PABYX (2.34B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (2.58) vs RLBAX (1.10). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.08 vs. PABYX (4.08). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.13 vs. PABYX (23.15).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.985 | 14.271 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 1.10 | 234% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 9.08 | 45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.84 | 48.64 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | 38.13 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.00 | 69.46 | 66% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement