Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$17.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.31B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$38.24
Change+$0.19 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets262.26B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a StrongBuy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 262B vs. PABYX (2.31B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (3.11) vs RLBAX (1.15). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.38 vs. PABYX (4.25). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.94 vs. PABYX (24.37).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.190 | 12.721 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.31B | 262B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.11 | 1.15 | 270% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.25 | 10.38 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.84 | 35.80 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.37 | 38.94 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 45.62 | 71.62 | 64% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement