Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$16.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.38
Change-$0.26 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.98B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. PABYX (2.23B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (3.17) vs RLBAX (1.17). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. PABYX (2.92). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.02 vs. PABYX (20.93).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.31 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.345 | 7.239 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 253B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 1.17 | 271% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 6.65 | 44% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.83 | 28.30 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.93 | 33.02 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.63 | 55.44 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement