Ad is loading...
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$15.48
Change+$0.22 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.37
Change+$0.43 (+1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. PABYX (2.04B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (2.96) vs RLBAX (1.27). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (171.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.37 vs. PABYX (-1.19). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.54 vs. PABYX (21.75).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.33 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.33 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.119 | -1.759 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 227B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 1.27 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 3.37 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.91 | 12.43 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.75 | 31.54 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.40 | 41.03 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...