Ad is loading...
PABYX vs RLBAX
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBAX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$15.30
Change-$0.44 (-2.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$33.17
Change-$0.87 (-2.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets235.03B
PABYX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBAX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Hold and RLBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 235B vs. PABYX (2.11B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: PABYX (2.96) vs RLBAX (1.27). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.33) is less costly to investors than PABYX (0.68). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBAX (171.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: PABYX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.57 vs. PABYX (-0.33). RLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 41.60 vs. PABYX (35.73).
| PABYX | RLBAX | PABYX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.33 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 1.33 | 51% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.072 | -2.348 | 3% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 235B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 1.27 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.33 | 0.57 | -58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.78 | 7.24 | 66% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.73 | 41.60 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.27 | 41.83 | 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...