Ad is loading...
PABYX vs RLBFX
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$15.48
Change+$0.22 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.04B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$33.76
Change+$0.43 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets226.9B
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 227B vs. PABYX (2.04B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABYX (2.96) vs RLBFX (2.26). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (171.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.48 vs. PABYX (-1.19). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.46 vs. PABYX (21.75).
| PABYX | RLBFX | PABYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.30 | 227% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.30 | 227% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.119 | -1.457 | 214% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.04B | 227B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.96 | 2.26 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.19 | 4.48 | -26% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.91 | 15.28 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.75 | 37.46 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.40 | 49.65 | 41% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers