Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBFX
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$17.63
Change+$0.06 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.34B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$39.17
Change+$0.17 (+0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets266.1B
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. PABYX (2.34B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABYX (2.58) vs RLBFX (2.00). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.26 vs. PABYX (4.08). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. PABYX (23.15).
| PABYX | RLBFX | PABYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.985 | 15.154 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.34B | 266B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.58 | 2.00 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 10.26 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.84 | 53.03 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.15 | 44.28 | 52% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.00 | 80.75 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement