Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBFX
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$16.37
Change-$0.14 (-0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.18B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$35.69
Change-$0.31 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets244.39B
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 244B vs. PABYX (2.18B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABYX (2.85) vs RLBFX (2.18). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.61 vs. PABYX (0.45). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.09 vs. PABYX (23.35).
| PABYX | RLBFX | PABYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.928 | 4.560 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.18B | 244B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.85 | 2.18 | 131% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.45 | 5.61 | 8% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.18 | 33.66 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.35 | 40.09 | 58% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.37 | 60.51 | 50% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement