Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBFX
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$16.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$36.83
Change-$0.26 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.98B
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBFX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 253B vs. PABYX (2.23B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABYX (3.17) vs RLBFX (2.08). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.83 vs. PABYX (2.92). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.05 vs. PABYX (20.93).
| PABYX | RLBFX | PABYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.345 | 7.900 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.23B | 253B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.17 | 2.08 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.92 | 7.83 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.83 | 31.88 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.93 | 39.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.63 | 65.43 | 53% |