Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PABYX vs RLBFX
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts PABYX vs RLBFX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y
Price$16.07
Change-$0.04 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.17B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.92
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.69B
PABYX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PABYX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PABYX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 238B vs. PABYX (2.17B). PABYX pays higher dividends than RLBFX: PABYX (2.94) vs RLBFX (2.26). PABYX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: PABYX (31 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). PABYX (0.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). PABYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 222.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). PABYX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: PABYX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. PABYX (0.59). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 39.77 vs. PABYX (24.56).
| PABYX | RLBFX | PABYX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.29 | 234% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.214 | 2.075 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 238B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.94 | 2.26 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.59 | 5.05 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.90 | 23.43 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.56 | 39.77 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.94 | 55.01 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement