PAC
Price
$212.18
Change
+$2.73 (+1.30%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
12.63B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UP
Price
$4.95
Change
+$0.03 (+0.61%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
179.57M
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAC vs UP

PAC vs UP Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAC vs. UP commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAC is a Hold and UP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (PAC: $212.18 vs. UP: $4.95)
Brand notoriety: PAC and UP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Air Freight/Couriers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAC: 112% vs. UP: 57%
Market capitalization -- PAC: $12.63B vs. UP: $179.57M
PAC [@Air Freight/Couriers] is valued at $12.63B. UP’s [@Air Freight/Couriers] market capitalization is $179.57M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry ranges from $1.38T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Air Freight/Couriers] industry is $4.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUP’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the long-term than UP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAC is a better buy in the short-term than UP.

Price Growth

PAC (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +2.51% price change this week, while UP (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was -1.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -32.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

UP is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Air Freight/Couriers (-2.60% weekly)

The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAC($12.6B) has a higher market cap than UP($180M). PAC has higher P/E ratio than UP: PAC (19.50) vs UP (0.12). PAC YTD gains are higher at: -19.516 vs. UP (-62.289). PAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 23.1B vs. UP (-125.36M). PAC has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. UP (54.1M). UP has less debt than PAC: UP (538M) vs PAC (65.7B). PAC has higher revenues than UP: PAC (42.1B) vs UP (728M).
PACUPPAC / UP
Capitalization12.6B180M7,000%
EBITDA23.1B-125.36M-18,428%
Gain YTD-19.516-62.28931%
P/E Ratio19.500.1215,826%
Revenue42.1B728M5,783%
Total Cash19.8B54.1M36,599%
Total Debt65.7B538M12,212%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAC: Fundamental Ratings
PAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39
SMR RATING
1..100
35
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PACUP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCVEX25.330.29
+1.16%
Hartford Schroders International Stk A
MTCIX84.880.56
+0.66%
MFS Technology I
VLAIX34.150.09
+0.26%
Value Line Asset Allocation Instl
FSCZX32.96N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val Z
GCEGX12.36-0.07
-0.56%
Goldman Sachs Clean Energy Income C

PAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAC has been closely correlated with ASR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAC jumps, then ASR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAC
1D Price
Change %
PAC100%
+1.30%
ASR - PAC
76%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
CAAP - PAC
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
UP - PAC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
JOBY - PAC
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
SRTA - PAC
13%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
More

UP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UP and SRTA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UP and SRTA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UP
1D Price
Change %
UP100%
+0.61%
SRTA - UP
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.70%
PAC - UP
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.30%
JOBY - UP
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
ASR - UP
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
OMAB - UP
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More