Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PCCEX
PACAX vs PCCEX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PCCEX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.81
Change+$0.04 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.97M
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R6
Price$10.88
Change+$0.05 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.97M
PACAX vs PCCEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PCCEX commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PCCEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX (562M) and PCCEX (562M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PCCEX pays higher dividends than PACAX: PCCEX (3.53) vs PACAX (3.25). PACAX was incepted earlier than PCCEX: PACAX (31 years) vs PCCEX (13 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PCCEX (0.67). PACAX (372.00) and PCCEX (372.00) have comparable annual turnover. PACAX (0) and PCCEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCCEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.69 vs. PACAX (5.40). PCCEX return over 5 years is better than : 10.31 vs. PACAX (8.51).
| PACAX | PCCEX | PACAX / PCCEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.67 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.67 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.679 | 2.779 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 562M | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.25 | 3.53 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.40 | 5.69 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.71 | 12.90 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.51 | 10.31 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.89 | 22.91 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement