Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PMIYX
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PMIYX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.22
Change+$0.03 (+0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets573.77M
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
Price$11.09
Change+$0.04 (+0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets223.72M
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PMIYX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PMIYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 574M vs. PMIYX (224M). PMIYX pays higher dividends than PACAX: PMIYX (4.31) vs PACAX (3.40). PACAX was incepted earlier than PMIYX: PACAX (32 years) vs PMIYX (3 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PMIYX (0.84). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PMIYX (143.00). PACAX (0) and PMIYX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMIYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.93 vs. PACAX (5.97).
| PACAX | PMIYX | PACAX / PMIYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.58 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.84 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.904 | 7.883 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 574M | 224M | 256% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.40 | 4.31 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | 7.93 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.48 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.58 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.40 | 21.21 | 134% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement