Ad is loading...
PACAX vs PMIYX
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PMIYX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.37
Change+$0.26 (+2.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets543.8M
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
Price$10.33
Change+$0.23 (+2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets212.67M
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PMIYX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PMIYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 544M vs. PMIYX (213M). PMIYX pays higher dividends than PACAX: PMIYX (4.36) vs PACAX (3.51). PACAX was incepted earlier than PMIYX: PACAX (31 years) vs PMIYX (2 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PMIYX (0.84). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PMIYX (143.00). PACAX (0) and PMIYX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMIYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. PACAX (0.10).
| PACAX | PMIYX | PACAX / PMIYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.58 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.84 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.819 | -3.778 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 544M | 213M | 255% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 4.36 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.10 | 1.80 | 5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.29 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.76 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 10.69 | 8.34 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...