Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs PMIYX
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs PMIYX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.64
Change-$0.10 (-0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.97M
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y
Price$10.58
Change-$0.08 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets221.68M
PACAX vs PMIYX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. PMIYX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and PMIYX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 562M vs. PMIYX (222M). PMIYX pays higher dividends than PACAX: PMIYX (4.39) vs PACAX (3.51). PACAX was incepted earlier than PMIYX: PACAX (31 years) vs PMIYX (2 years). PACAX (1.00) is less costly to investors than PMIYX (0.84). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PMIYX (143.00). PACAX (0) and PMIYX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PMIYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. PACAX (5.41).
| PACAX | PMIYX | PACAX / PMIYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.58 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.84 | 119% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 2 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.393 | 1.898 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 222M | 253% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 4.39 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.41 | 6.83 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.47 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.03 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.47 | 15.97 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement