Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACAX vs RPCCX
PACAX vs RPCCX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs RPCCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$11.34
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets587.04M
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv C
Price$9.68
Change-$0.02 (-0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.12M
PACAX vs RPCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. RPCCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Buy and RPCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 587M vs. RPCCX (154M). PACAX pays higher dividends than RPCCX: PACAX (3.15) vs RPCCX (2.38). PACAX was incepted earlier than RPCCX: PACAX (32 years) vs RPCCX (22 years). RPCCX (1.69) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. RPCCX (7.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPCCX: PACAX (0) vs RPCCX (2000). RPCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.92 vs. PACAX (6.41). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 11.24 vs. RPCCX (2.74).
| PACAX | RPCCX | PACAX / RPCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.69 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.69 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.059 | 8.434 | 107% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 587M | 154M | 381% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.15 | 2.38 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.41 | 6.92 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.10 | 26.29 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.24 | 2.74 | 410% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.61 | 15.25 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers