Ad is loading...
PACAX vs RPCCX
PACAX vs RPCCX Comparison
Open Charts PACAX vs RPCCX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv A
Price$10.28
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets548.77M
Columbia Capital Allocation Cnsrv C
Price$8.94
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets146.8M
PACAX vs RPCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACAX vs. RPCCX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACAX is a Hold and RPCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACAX has more cash in the bank: 549M vs. RPCCX (147M). PACAX pays higher dividends than RPCCX: PACAX (3.51) vs RPCCX (2.55). PACAX was incepted earlier than RPCCX: PACAX (31 years) vs RPCCX (21 years). RPCCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than PACAX (1.00). PACAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. RPCCX (17.00). PACAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPCCX: PACAX (0) vs RPCCX (2000). RPCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.26 vs. PACAX (2.26). PACAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.13 vs. RPCCX (-0.17).
| PACAX | RPCCX | PACAX / RPCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.71 | 58% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.71 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.582 | -1.368 | 189% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 549M | 147M | 373% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.51 | 2.55 | 138% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.26 | 3.26 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.27 | 0.52 | 635% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.13 | -0.17 | -4,816% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.12 | 0.84 | 1,447% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...