Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PACIX vs PHIKX
PACIX vs PHIKX Comparison
Open Charts PACIX vs PHIKX
Columbia Convertible Securities A
Price$24.25
Change+$0.16 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
Columbia Convertible Securities C
Price$24.11
Change+$0.17 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.19B
PACIX vs PHIKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PACIX vs. PHIKX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PACIX is a Hold and PHIKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PACIX (1.19B) and PHIKX (1.19B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PACIX pays higher dividends than PHIKX: PACIX (1.74) vs PHIKX (1.07). PACIX was incepted earlier than PHIKX: PACIX (38 years) vs PHIKX (29 years). PHIKX (1.90) is less costly to investors than PACIX (1.15). PACIX (108.00) and PHIKX (108.00) have comparable annual turnover. PACIX (2000) and PHIKX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PACIX (1000) and PHIKX (1000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. PACIX (18.17) and PHIKX (17.31) have marching annual gain over last year. PACIX return over 5 years is better than : 0.79 vs. PHIKX (-3.00).
| PACIX | PHIKX | PACIX / PHIKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.08 | 1.83 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 1.90 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.837 | 11.245 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 1.19B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.74 | 1.07 | 162% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.17 | 17.31 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.72 | 28.81 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.79 | -3.00 | -26% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.42 | 52.14 | 122% |