Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAFJX vs RBHTX
PAFJX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAFJX vs. RBHTX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAFJX is a Hold and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHTX has more cash in the bank: 41.7B vs. PAFJX (27.3M). PAFJX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: PAFJX (4.61) vs RBHTX (0.42). PAFJX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: PAFJX (5 years) vs RBHTX (18 years). PAFJX (2.06) is less costly to investors than RBHTX (1.46). PAFJX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. RBHTX (5.00). PAFJX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBHTX: PAFJX (0) vs RBHTX (250). RBHTX (9.50) and PAFJX (9.30) have marching annual gain over last year.
| PAFJX | RBHTX | PAFJX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 1.46 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.06 | 1.46 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.773 | 10.500 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.3M | 41.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.61 | 0.42 | 1,088% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.30 | 9.50 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.12 | 39.03 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 39.30 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 70.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement