Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMC vs XMHQ
PAMC vs XMHQ Comparison
Open Charts PAMC vs XMHQ
Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alt ETF
Price$46.89
Change+$0.27 (+0.58%)
Volume$103
Net Assets58.56M
Invesco S&P MidCap Quality ETF
Price$105.49
Change+$1.31 (+1.26%)
Volume$961
Net Assets5.23B
PAMC vs XMHQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMC vs. XMHQ commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMC is a Hold and XMHQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XMHQ has more net assets: 5.23B vs. PAMC (58.6M). XMHQ has a higher annual dividend yield than PAMC: XMHQ (6.309) vs PAMC (0.826). PAMC was incepted earlier than XMHQ: PAMC (5 years) vs XMHQ (19 years). XMHQ (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than PAMC (0.60). PAMC has a higher turnover XMHQ (58.00) vs XMHQ (58.00).
| PAMC | XMHQ | PAMC / XMHQ | |
| Gain YTD | 0.826 | 6.309 | 13% |
| Net Assets | 58.6M | 5.23B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.25 | 240% |
| Turnover | 475.00 | 58.00 | 819% |
| Yield | 0.80 | 0.63 | 128% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PAMC | XMHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DFNM | 48.04 | 0.06 | +0.13% |
| Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| EMDV | 45.18 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares MSCI Emerg Mkts Div Growers | |||
| ZTOP | 52.51 | -0.03 | -0.06% |
| F/m High Yield 100 ETF | |||
| MINV | 38.12 | -0.30 | -0.78% |
| Matthews Asia Innovators Active ETF | |||
| EWN | 58.56 | -1.12 | -1.88% |
| iShares MSCI Netherlands ETF | |||
PAMC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAMC has been closely correlated with EVR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAMC jumps, then EVR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAMC | 100% | -0.43% | ||
| EVR - PAMC | 80% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| JHG - PAMC | 80% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| BDC - PAMC | 80% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| JEF - PAMC | 78% Closely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| VNT - PAMC | 78% Closely correlated | -1.73% | ||
More | ||||