Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs PEXMX
PAMCX vs PEXMX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs PEXMX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$93.92
Change+$0.21 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.01B
T. Rowe Price Extended Equity Market Idx
Price$34.86
Change+$0.04 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1B
PAMCX vs PEXMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. PEXMX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and PEXMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25B vs. PEXMX (1B). PEXMX pays higher dividends than PAMCX: PEXMX (0.93) vs PAMCX (0.00). PAMCX was incepted earlier than PEXMX: PAMCX (26 years) vs PEXMX (28 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than PEXMX (0.23). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. PEXMX (11.80). PAMCX (2500) and PEXMX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PEXMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.80 vs. PAMCX (-9.82). PEXMX return over 5 years is better than : 4.82 vs. PAMCX (-12.41).
| PAMCX | PEXMX | PAMCX / PEXMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.23 | 439% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.23 | 439% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.043 | 6.345 | -1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25B | 1B | 2,498% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.93 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.82 | -1.80 | 545% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.67 | 29.15 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.41 | 4.82 | -258% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.98 | 51.77 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement