Ad is loading...
PAMCX vs PNOTX
PAMCX vs PNOTX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs PNOTX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$83.96
Change+$6.65 (+8.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.91B
Putnam Sustainable Future R6
Price$17.89
Change+$1.63 (+10.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.47M
PAMCX vs PNOTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. PNOTX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and PNOTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. PNOTX (336M). PAMCX (0.00) and PNOTX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than PNOTX: PAMCX (25 years) vs PNOTX (7 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than PNOTX (0.68). PNOTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PNOTX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: PNOTX (0) vs PAMCX (2500). PAMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -24.18 vs. PNOTX (-25.92). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.49 vs. PNOTX (-0.85).
| PAMCX | PNOTX | PAMCX / PNOTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.68 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.68 | 149% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.720 | -21.030 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 336M | 7,708% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.18 | -25.92 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.60 | -15.93 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.49 | -0.85 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers