Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs POAGX
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs POAGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$97.23
Change+$0.23 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.95B
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
Price$53.85
Change+$0.33 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.61B
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. POAGX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Buy and POAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. POAGX (6.61B). POAGX pays higher dividends than PAMCX: POAGX (0.02) vs PAMCX (0.00). PAMCX was incepted earlier than POAGX: PAMCX (26 years) vs POAGX (21 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than POAGX (0.66). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. POAGX (9.00). POAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: POAGX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). POAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.44 vs. PAMCX (-6.12). POAGX return over 5 years is better than : 7.80 vs. PAMCX (-4.14).
| PAMCX | POAGX | PAMCX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.235 | 21.443 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 6.61B | 409% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.12 | 13.44 | -46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.39 | 42.22 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.14 | 7.80 | -53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.95 | 63.54 | 39% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement