Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs POAGX
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs POAGX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$94.31
Change-$1.19 (-1.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.5B
PRIMECAP Odyssey Aggressive Growth
Price$46.76
Change-$0.62 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.94B
PAMCX vs POAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. POAGX commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Buy and POAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27.5B vs. POAGX (5.94B). POAGX pays higher dividends than PAMCX: POAGX (0.02) vs PAMCX (0.00). PAMCX was incepted earlier than POAGX: PAMCX (25 years) vs POAGX (21 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than POAGX (0.66). PAMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. POAGX (9.00). POAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: POAGX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). POAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.20 vs. PAMCX (-4.92). POAGX return over 5 years is better than : 1.83 vs. PAMCX (0.93).
| PAMCX | POAGX | PAMCX / POAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.66 | 153% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.278 | 7.511 | 30% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.5B | 5.94B | 463% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.92 | 5.20 | -95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.06 | 13.54 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.93 | 1.83 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.72 | 35.01 | 56% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers