Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs SMFAX
PAMCX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs SMFAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.08
Change+$0.27 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.08B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$34.12
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets749.61M
PAMCX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. SMFAX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.1B vs. SMFAX (750M). PAMCX (0.00) and SMFAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: PAMCX (26 years) vs SMFAX (14 years). SMFAX (1.39) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. PAMCX (-8.46). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 23.56 vs. PAMCX (-6.83).
| PAMCX | SMFAX | PAMCX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.21 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.39 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.969 | 13.068 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.1B | 750M | 3,480% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.46 | 9.40 | -90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.74 | 53.01 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.83 | 23.56 | -29% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.48 | 104.77 | 22% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement