Ad is loading...
PAMCX vs SMFAX
PAMCX vs SMFAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs SMFAX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$88.72
Change+$0.79 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.52B
American Beacon Stephens Mid-Cap Gr A
Price$29.76
Change+$0.43 (+1.47%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets646.44M
PAMCX vs SMFAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. SMFAX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a StrongBuy and SMFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 26.5B vs. SMFAX (646M). PAMCX (0.00) and SMFAX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than SMFAX: PAMCX (25 years) vs SMFAX (13 years). SMFAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). SMFAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX (2500) and SMFAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. SMFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.44 vs. PAMCX (-10.91). SMFAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.88 vs. PAMCX (5.72).
| PAMCX | SMFAX | PAMCX / SMFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.21 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.41 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.418 | -2.720 | 236% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 646M | 4,102% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.91 | -0.44 | 2,473% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.65 | 22.11 | 17% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.72 | 31.88 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.21 | 64.63 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers