Ad is loading...
PAMCX vs TMDPX
PAMCX vs TMDPX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs TMDPX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$88.98
Change+$0.26 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.04B
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
Price$15.99
Change-$0.01 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.5B
PAMCX vs TMDPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. TMDPX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a StrongBuy and TMDPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. TMDPX (1.5B). PAMCX (0.00) and TMDPX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than TMDPX: PAMCX (25 years) vs TMDPX (20 years). TMDPX (1.06) and PAMCX (1.01) have similar cost to investors . TMDPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). TMDPX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAMCX: TMDPX (2000) vs PAMCX (2500). TMDPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.02 vs. PAMCX (-10.53). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.99 vs. TMDPX (-4.54).
| PAMCX | TMDPX | PAMCX / TMDPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.06 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 1.06 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.300 | 1.653 | -321% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 1.5B | 1,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.53 | -2.02 | 521% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.01 | 20.59 | 19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.99 | -4.54 | -154% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.58 | -17.87 | -70% |