Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs TOECX
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs TOECX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.01
Change+$0.40 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28B
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth C
Price$40.31
Change+$0.46 (+1.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.43B
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. TOECX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a StrongBuy and TOECX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 28B vs. TOECX (1.43B). PAMCX (0.00) and TOECX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than TOECX: PAMCX (25 years) vs TOECX (31 years). TOECX (2.07) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). TOECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX (2500) and TOECX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TOECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.44 vs. PAMCX (-2.05). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 5.54 vs. TOECX (0.95).
| PAMCX | TOECX | PAMCX / TOECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.00 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.07 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.182 | 8.652 | 25% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28B | 1.43B | 1,961% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.05 | 19.44 | -11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.70 | 48.87 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.54 | 0.95 | 585% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.74 | -3.21 | -647% |