Ad is loading...
PAMCX vs TOECX
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs TOECX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$83.96
Change+$6.65 (+8.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.91B
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth C
Price$33.09
Change+$3.38 (+11.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.2B
PAMCX vs TOECX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. TOECX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Hold and TOECX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 25.9B vs. TOECX (1.2B). PAMCX (0.00) and TOECX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than TOECX: PAMCX (25 years) vs TOECX (31 years). TOECX (2.07) is less costly to investors than PAMCX (1.01). TOECX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX (2500) and TOECX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. TOECX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -17.63 vs. PAMCX (-24.18). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.49 vs. TOECX (-11.38).
| PAMCX | TOECX | PAMCX / TOECX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.00 | 51% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 2.07 | 49% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -17.720 | -19.919 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 25.9B | 1.2B | 2,155% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -24.18 | -17.63 | 137% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.60 | -12.06 | 171% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.49 | -11.38 | -4% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.75 | -30.73 | 9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers