Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMCX vs WFDSX
PAMCX vs WFDSX Comparison
Open Charts PAMCX vs WFDSX
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Adv
Price$96.10
Change-$0.08 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27B
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
Price$33.26
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.73M
PAMCX vs WFDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMCX vs. WFDSX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMCX is a Buy and WFDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAMCX has more cash in the bank: 27B vs. WFDSX (955M). PAMCX (0.00) and WFDSX (0.00) have matching dividends . PAMCX was incepted earlier than WFDSX: PAMCX (25 years) vs WFDSX (19 years). PAMCX (1.01) is less costly to investors than WFDSX (0.92). WFDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. PAMCX (22.60). PAMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFDSX: PAMCX (2500) vs WFDSX (1000000). WFDSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.72 vs. PAMCX (-6.28). PAMCX return over 5 years is better than : -0.25 vs. WFDSX (-21.93).
| PAMCX | WFDSX | PAMCX / WFDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.89 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.92 | 110% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.363 | 7.318 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27B | 955M | 2,827% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.28 | 2.72 | -231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.40 | 32.47 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.25 | -21.93 | 1% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.12 | -3.17 | -761% |