Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMTX vs RTEAX
PAMTX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMTX vs RTEAX
Putnam Strategic Intermediate Muncpl C
Price$13.89
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.11B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.65
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6B
PAMTX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMTX vs. RTEAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMTX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 6B vs. PAMTX (2.11B). RTEAX pays higher dividends than PAMTX: RTEAX (3.32) vs PAMTX (2.52). PAMTX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: PAMTX (26 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). PAMTX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). PAMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RTEAX (39.00). PAMTX (0) and RTEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.91 vs. PAMTX (-1.65). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.00 vs. PAMTX (-8.65).
| PAMTX | RTEAX | PAMTX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.80 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.82 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.385 | 1.219 | -32% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 6B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.52 | 3.32 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.65 | 0.91 | -182% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.82 | 8.30 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.65 | -1.00 | 862% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.12 | 2.55 | -279% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement