Ad is loading...
PAMTX vs RTEAX
PAMTX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMTX vs RTEAX
Putnam Strategic Intermediate Muncpl C
Price$13.78
Change+$0.23 (+1.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.55
Change+$0.48 (+2.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.69B
PAMTX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMTX vs. RTEAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMTX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 5.69B vs. PAMTX (1.95B). RTEAX pays higher dividends than PAMTX: RTEAX (3.25) vs PAMTX (2.37). PAMTX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: PAMTX (26 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). PAMTX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). PAMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RTEAX (39.00). PAMTX (0) and RTEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.81 vs. PAMTX (-2.94). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.11 vs. PAMTX (-7.44).
| PAMTX | RTEAX | PAMTX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.80 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.82 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.283 | -2.858 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.95B | 5.69B | 34% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.37 | 3.25 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.94 | -0.81 | 365% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.33 | 0.83 | -403% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.44 | -2.11 | 353% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.44 | -2.80 | 408% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...