Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAMTX vs RTEAX
PAMTX vs RTEAX Comparison
Open Charts PAMTX vs RTEAX
Putnam Strategic Intermediate Muncpl C
Price$13.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.06B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$21.65
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.91B
PAMTX vs RTEAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAMTX vs. RTEAX commentary
Jul 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAMTX is a Hold and RTEAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTEAX has more cash in the bank: 5.91B vs. PAMTX (2.06B). RTEAX pays higher dividends than PAMTX: RTEAX (3.33) vs PAMTX (2.46). PAMTX was incepted earlier than RTEAX: PAMTX (26 years) vs RTEAX (15 years). PAMTX (1.65) is less costly to investors than RTEAX (0.82). PAMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RTEAX (39.00). PAMTX (0) and RTEAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RTEAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.73 vs. PAMTX (-0.99). RTEAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.85 vs. PAMTX (-7.60).
| PAMTX | RTEAX | PAMTX / RTEAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.80 | 206% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.82 | 201% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.849 | 0.395 | -215% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.06B | 5.91B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 3.33 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | 1.73 | -57% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.61 | 6.53 | 9% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.60 | -0.85 | 895% |
| Returns for 10 years | -7.49 | 2.03 | -369% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement