Advertisement
PANHF vs PBSV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANHF is a Buy and PBSV is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PANHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBSV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- PANHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PBSV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PANHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBSV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PANHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- PBSV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
PANHF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +15.05% price change this week, while PBSV (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +5.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.01%.
Reported Earning Dates
PBSV is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.00% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| PANHF | PBSV | PANHF / PBSV | |
| Capitalization | 5.02B | 13.8M | 36,370% |
| EBITDA | 271M | -523.87K | -51,730% |
| Gain YTD | 198.272 | 24.698 | 803% |
| P/E Ratio | 190.94 | 20.23 | 944% |
| Revenue | 5.22B | 9.64M | 54,118% |
| Total Cash | 7.77B | 10.4M | 74,663% |
| Total Debt | 46M | 113K | 40,708% |
PANHF | PBSV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 90 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PBSV's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as PANHF (95). This means that PBSV’s stock grew similarly to PANHF’s over the last 12 months.
PBSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PANHF (100). This means that PBSV’s stock grew similarly to PANHF’s over the last 12 months.
PANHF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBSV (92). This means that PANHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBSV’s over the last 12 months.
PANHF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PBSV (50). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PBSV’s over the last 12 months.
PANHF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PBSV (22). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PBSV’s over the last 12 months.
| PANHF | PBSV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 18 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 81% |
Advertisement
PANHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PANHF and LSPD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PANHF and LSPD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LSPD - PANHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.49% | ||
| CPAY - PANHF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.37% | ||
| OVTZ - PANHF | 18% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| PMCUF - PANHF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| PBSV - PANHF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
PBSV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PBSV and MFON have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBSV and MFON's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBSV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBSV | 100% | N/A | ||
| MFON - PBSV | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| ZUKI - PBSV | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
| PONGF - PBSV | 9% Poorly correlated | -10.00% | ||
| PMCUF - PBSV | 6% Poorly correlated | -2.50% | ||
| PANHF - PBSV | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||