Advertisement
PANHF vs PMCUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANHF is a Buy and PMCUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PANHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- PANHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PANHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCUF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- PANHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- PMCUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
PANHF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was +0.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.66%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.68% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| PANHF | PMCUF | PANHF / PMCUF | |
| Capitalization | 4.89B | 20.6B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 271M | 165M | 164% |
| Gain YTD | 198.272 | 27.430 | 723% |
| P/E Ratio | 191.48 | 272.87 | 70% |
| Revenue | 5.22B | 213M | 2,449% |
| Total Cash | 7.77B | 209M | 3,715% |
| Total Debt | 46M | 2.26M | 2,040% |
PANHF | PMCUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 50 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 17 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PANHF's Valuation (95) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (97). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PANHF (100). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PANHF’s over the last 12 months.
PMCUF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PANHF (50). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to PANHF’s over the last 12 months.
PANHF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (43). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
PANHF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (22). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.
| PANHF | PMCUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 43% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 48% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
PANHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PANHF and LSPD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PANHF and LSPD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PANHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| LSPD - PANHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
| CPAY - PANHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
| OVTZ - PANHF | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| PMCUF - PANHF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.48% | ||
| PBSV - PANHF | 4% Poorly correlated | -2.00% | ||
More | ||||
PMCUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PMCUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PMCUF | 100% | -3.48% | ||
| OCLCF - PMCUF | 32% Poorly correlated | -7.71% | ||
| TMSNY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
| FSLY - PMCUF | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.92% | ||
| NEXXY - PMCUF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| TMNSF - PMCUF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||