PANHF
Price
$2.10
Change
+$0.25 (+13.51%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
6.05B
PMCUF
Price
$194.76
Change
+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
20.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PANHF vs PMCUF

Header iconPANHF vs PMCUF Comparison
Open Charts PANHF vs PMCUFBanner chart's image
Ping An Healthcare & Technology
Price$2.10
Change+$0.25 (+13.51%)
Volume$12.93K
Capitalization6.05B
Pro Medicus
Price$194.76
Change+$4.51 (+2.37%)
Volume$35
Capitalization20.4B
PANHF vs PMCUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PANHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PANHF vs. PMCUF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PANHF is a Buy and PMCUF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PANHF: $2.10 vs. PMCUF: $194.76)
Brand notoriety: PANHF and PMCUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Services to the Health Industry industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PANHF: 308% vs. PMCUF: 15%
Market capitalization -- PANHF: $6.05B vs. PMCUF: $20.33B
PANHF [@Services to the Health Industry] is valued at $6.05B. PMCUF’s [@Services to the Health Industry] market capitalization is $20.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry ranges from $44.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Services to the Health Industry] industry is $2.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PANHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePMCUF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PANHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PMCUF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, PMCUF is a better buy in the long-term than PANHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PANHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PMCUF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PANHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • PMCUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PANHF is a better buy in the short-term than PMCUF.

Price Growth

PANHF (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PMCUF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was -2.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Services to the Health Industry (-2.30% weekly)

This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PMCUF($20.4B) has a higher market cap than PANHF($6.05B). PMCUF has higher P/E ratio than PANHF: PMCUF (270.31) vs PANHF (166.67). PANHF YTD gains are higher at: 159.259 vs. PMCUF (25.433). PMCUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 165M vs. PANHF (-22.59M). PANHF has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. PMCUF (209M). PMCUF has less debt than PANHF: PMCUF (2.26M) vs PANHF (48.8M). PANHF has higher revenues than PMCUF: PANHF (4.55B) vs PMCUF (213M).
PANHFPMCUFPANHF / PMCUF
Capitalization6.05B20.4B30%
EBITDA-22.59M165M-14%
Gain YTD159.25925.433626%
P/E Ratio166.67270.3162%
Revenue4.55B213M2,134%
Total Cash11.2B209M5,359%
Total Debt48.8M2.26M2,164%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PANHF vs PMCUF: Fundamental Ratings
PANHF
PMCUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10020
SMR RATING
1..100
3619
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1218
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PANHF's Valuation (93) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (97). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PANHF (100). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PANHF’s over the last 12 months.

PMCUF's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as PANHF (36). This means that PMCUF’s stock grew similarly to PANHF’s over the last 12 months.

PANHF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (44). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

PANHF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as PMCUF (18). This means that PANHF’s stock grew similarly to PMCUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PANHFPMCUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PANHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PMCUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TMAT25.620.42
+1.67%
Main Thematic Innovation ETF
PGF14.710.15
+1.03%
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
GOVT23.100.11
+0.50%
iShares US Treasury Bond ETF
LFAW159.50N/A
N/A
LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF
QULL51.54-0.67
-1.28%
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN

PANHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PANHF and LSPD have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PANHF and LSPD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PANHF
1D Price
Change %
PANHF100%
N/A
LSPD - PANHF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
CPAY - PANHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.03%
OVTZ - PANHF
18%
Poorly correlated
+2.06%
PMCUF - PANHF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBSV - PANHF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PMCUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PMCUF and OCLCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PMCUF and OCLCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PMCUF
1D Price
Change %
PMCUF100%
N/A
OCLCF - PMCUF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMSNY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
-12.27%
FSLY - PMCUF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
NEXXY - PMCUF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
TMNSF - PMCUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More