It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PAOTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQTRHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAOTF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QTRHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
PAOTF (@Telecommunications Equipment) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QTRHF (@Telecommunications Equipment) price change was -6.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Telecommunications Equipment industry was -0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.47%.
QTRHF is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
The Telecommunications Equipment industry produces voice and data communications equipment, which includes fiber optic delivery products, digital signal processors, high-speed voice, data and video delivery. Additionally, satellite systems, global positioning systems, wireless data systems, personal communications equipment, telephone handsets and payload equipment for satellites also fall into this category. Apple Inc., QUALCOMM Incorporated and Nokia are major global players in this segment.
PAOTF | QTRHF | PAOTF / QTRHF | |
Capitalization | 122M | 132M | 92% |
EBITDA | -8.05M | -37.03M | 22% |
Gain YTD | -3.846 | -23.649 | 16% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 58.82 | - |
Revenue | 60.5M | 181M | 33% |
Total Cash | 70M | 51.7M | 135% |
Total Debt | 8.9M | 88.7M | 10% |
PAOTF | QTRHF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QTRHF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as PAOTF (54). This means that QTRHF’s stock grew similarly to PAOTF’s over the last 12 months.
QTRHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PAOTF (100). This means that QTRHF’s stock grew similarly to PAOTF’s over the last 12 months.
QTRHF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as PAOTF (96). This means that QTRHF’s stock grew similarly to PAOTF’s over the last 12 months.
PAOTF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as QTRHF (62). This means that PAOTF’s stock grew similarly to QTRHF’s over the last 12 months.
QTRHF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PAOTF (100). This means that QTRHF’s stock grew significantly faster than PAOTF’s over the last 12 months.
PAOTF | QTRHF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago60% | 2 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 7 days ago53% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago43% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago66% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 22 days ago69% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago76% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago71% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PAOTF and UBLXF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PAOTF and UBLXF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAOTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAOTF | 100% | N/A | ||
UBLXF - PAOTF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
QTRHF - PAOTF | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.69% | ||
NRRWF - PAOTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SIMTF - PAOTF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
OKIEY - PAOTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that QTRHF and CLRO have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QTRHF and CLRO's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTRHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QTRHF | 100% | -0.69% | ||
CLRO - QTRHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +4.18% | ||
MOYFF - QTRHF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NOKBF - QTRHF | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.59% | ||
ONDS - QTRHF | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
PAOTF - QTRHF | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |