Ad is loading...
PASCX vs RWINX
PASCX vs RWINX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PASCX vs. RWINX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PASCX is a Hold and RWINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PASCX has more cash in the bank: 11.2B vs. RWINX (152M). RWINX pays higher dividends than PASCX: RWINX (8.18) vs PASCX (5.01). PASCX was incepted earlier than RWINX: PASCX (22 years) vs RWINX (7 years). PASCX (3.15) is less costly to investors than RWINX (1.32). PASCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RWINX (49.00). PASCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWINX: PASCX (1000) vs RWINX (10000). PASCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.15 vs. RWINX (-6.96). PASCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.43 vs. RWINX (22.70).
| PASCX | RWINX | PASCX / RWINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 3.06 | 1.30 | 236% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.15 | 1.32 | 238% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.022 | -6.341 | -0% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 10000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 11.2B | 152M | 7,368% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.01 | 8.18 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.15 | -6.96 | -60% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.30 | 0.92 | -33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.43 | 22.70 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...