Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PAWAX vs RGACX
PAWAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PAWAX vs RGACX
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-Adv
Price$78.42
Change-$0.25 (-0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.5B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
PAWAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAWAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAWAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. PAWAX (16.5B). RGACX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: RGACX (0.07) vs PAWAX (0.00). PAWAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PAWAX (20 years) vs RGACX (23 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.20 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: RGACX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. PAWAX (8.42). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. PAWAX (16.26).
| PAWAX | RGACX | PAWAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.789 | 15.516 | 76% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16.5B | 332B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.42 | 17.83 | 47% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.36 | 58.53 | 88% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.26 | 40.02 | 41% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.13 | 95.93 | 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers