Ad is loading...
PAWAX vs RGACX
PAWAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts PAWAX vs RGACX
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-Adv
Price$63.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.76B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$63.95
Change+$0.04 (+0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets261.04B
PAWAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PAWAX vs. RGACX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAWAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PAWAX (14.8B). RGACX pays higher dividends than PAWAX: RGACX (0.09) vs PAWAX (0.00). PAWAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: PAWAX (19 years) vs RGACX (23 years). PAWAX (1.05) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). PAWAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 96.20 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than PAWAX: RGACX (250) vs PAWAX (2500). PAWAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.59 vs. RGACX (-4.11). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 34.84 vs. PAWAX (25.10).
| PAWAX | RGACX | PAWAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.427 | -11.224 | 66% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 261B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.09 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.59 | -4.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.27 | 3.86 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.10 | 34.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.97 | 45.88 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...