PAX
Price
$11.97
Change
-$0.31 (-2.52%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
67 days until earnings call
SEIC
Price
$80.25
Change
-$1.99 (-2.42%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
9.3B
53 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAX vs SEIC

Header iconPAX vs SEIC Comparison
Open Charts PAX vs SEICBanner chart's image
Patria Investments
Price$11.97
Change-$0.31 (-2.52%)
Volume$979.5K
Capitalization2.2B
SEI Investments
Price$80.25
Change-$1.99 (-2.42%)
Volume$488.47K
Capitalization9.3B
PAX vs SEIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAX vs. SEIC commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAX is a Hold and SEIC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (PAX: $11.97 vs. SEIC: $80.25)
Brand notoriety: PAX and SEIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAX: 174% vs. SEIC: 84%
Market capitalization -- PAX: $2.2B vs. SEIC: $9.3B
PAX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.2B. SEIC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSEIC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SEIC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SEIC is a better buy in the long-term than PAX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAX’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SEIC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SEIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than SEIC.

Price Growth

PAX (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.67% price change this week, while SEIC (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SEIC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SEIC($9.3B) has a higher market cap than PAX($2.2B). SEIC has higher P/E ratio than PAX: SEIC (20.47) vs PAX (18.37). PAX YTD gains are higher at: 2.923 vs. SEIC (-2.704). SEIC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 669M vs. PAX (143M). SEIC has more cash in the bank: 866M vs. PAX (12.8M). PAX has less debt than SEIC: PAX (15.6M) vs SEIC (25.4M). SEIC has higher revenues than PAX: SEIC (1.92B) vs PAX (307M).
PAXSEICPAX / SEIC
Capitalization2.2B9.3B24%
EBITDA143M669M21%
Gain YTD2.923-2.704-108%
P/E Ratio18.3720.4790%
Revenue307M1.92B16%
Total Cash12.8M866M1%
Total Debt15.6M25.4M61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SEIC: Fundamental Ratings
SEIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
46
SMR RATING
1..100
40
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAXSEIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SEIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USHY37.23-0.06
-0.16%
iShares Broad USD High Yield Corp Bd ETF
SEIQ36.05-0.31
-0.86%
SEI Enhanced US Large Cap Qual Fac ETF
THLV27.45-0.26
-0.94%
THOR Equal Weight Low Volatility ETF
NERD22.99-0.26
-1.12%
Roundhill Video Games ETF
QGRW49.60-1.28
-2.52%
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth ETF

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been loosely correlated with BK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
-2.52%
BK - PAX
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
CG - PAX
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
BN - PAX
52%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
SEIC - PAX
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
BAM - PAX
51%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
More

SEIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SEIC
1D Price
Change %
SEIC100%
-2.42%
TROW - SEIC
68%
Closely correlated
-2.05%
JHG - SEIC
67%
Closely correlated
-1.88%
APAM - SEIC
66%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
BN - SEIC
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
AMG - SEIC
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
More