PAX
Price
$13.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.21B
66 days until earnings call
SRXXF
Price
$9.90
Change
+$1.20 (+13.79%)
Updated
Apr 14 closing price
Capitalization
421.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PAX vs SRXXF

Header iconPAX vs SRXXF Comparison
Open Charts PAX vs SRXXFBanner chart's image
Patria Investments
Price$13.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$626.61K
Capitalization2.21B
SPARX Asset Management
Price$9.90
Change+$1.20 (+13.79%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization421.37M
PAX vs SRXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAX vs. SRXXF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAX is a Buy and SRXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PAX: $13.85 vs. SRXXF: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: PAX and SRXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAX: 128% vs. SRXXF: 100%
Market capitalization -- PAX: $2.21B vs. SRXXF: $421.37M
PAX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.21B. SRXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $421.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSRXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SRXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PAX and SRXXF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAX’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PAX’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

PAX (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.29% price change this week, while SRXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.21B) has a higher market cap than SRXXF($421M). PAX has higher P/E ratio than SRXXF: PAX (25.70) vs SRXXF (10.96). PAX YTD gains are higher at: 23.433 vs. SRXXF (13.793). SRXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.55B vs. PAX (138M). SRXXF has more cash in the bank: 16.5B vs. PAX (165M). PAX has less debt than SRXXF: PAX (161M) vs SRXXF (9B). SRXXF has higher revenues than PAX: SRXXF (17.3B) vs PAX (398M).
PAXSRXXFPAX / SRXXF
Capitalization2.21B421M525%
EBITDA138M8.55B2%
Gain YTD23.43313.793170%
P/E Ratio25.7010.96234%
Revenue398M17.3B2%
Total Cash165M16.5B1%
Total Debt161M9B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRXXF: Fundamental Ratings
SRXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
42
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAXSRXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
68%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGRIX83.63N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Value A
MVALX42.74N/A
N/A
Meridian Contrarian Legacy
TMDPX17.52N/A
N/A
AMG TimesSquare Mid Cap Growth N
BUFDX34.39N/A
N/A
Buffalo Growth & Income
NEQAX12.81N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman U.S. Equity Impact A

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
N/A
BN - PAX
66%
Closely correlated
-0.08%
CG - PAX
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
SEIC - PAX
63%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
JHG - PAX
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
VINP - PAX
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
More

SRXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRXXF and MGPUF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRXXF and MGPUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRXXF
1D Price
Change %
SRXXF100%
N/A
MGPUF - SRXXF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETAA - SRXXF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PAX - SRXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TRIN - SRXXF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.25%
VINP - SRXXF
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.10%
More