Ad is loading...
PAX
Price
$11.92
Change
-$0.29 (-2.38%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
93 days until earnings call
VINP
Price
$10.34
Change
-$0.23 (-2.18%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
115 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAX vs VINP

Header iconPAX vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts PAX vs VINPBanner chart's image
Patria Investments
Price$11.92
Change-$0.29 (-2.38%)
Volume$539.25K
CapitalizationN/A
Vinci Partners Investments
Price$10.34
Change-$0.23 (-2.18%)
Volume$39.86K
CapitalizationN/A
PAX vs VINP Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAX vs. VINP commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAX is a Sell and VINP is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (PAX: $11.92 vs. VINP: $10.34)
Brand notoriety: PAX and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAX: 82% vs. VINP: 63%
Market capitalization -- PAX: $2.2B vs. VINP: $607.7M
PAX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.2B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $607.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PAX and VINP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAX’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than VINP.

Price Growth

PAX (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.97% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

VINP is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.13% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.2B) has a higher market cap than VINP($608M). PAX has higher P/E ratio than VINP: PAX (18.37) vs VINP (13.92). VINP YTD gains are higher at: -0.865 vs. PAX (-19.051). VINP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 289M vs. PAX (143M). VINP has higher revenues than PAX: VINP (608M) vs PAX (307M).
PAXVINPPAX / VINP
Capitalization2.2B608M362%
EBITDA143M289M49%
Gain YTD-19.051-0.8652,202%
P/E Ratio18.3713.92132%
Revenue307M608M50%
Total Cash12.8MN/A-
Total Debt15.6MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAXVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KARIX9.620.05
+0.52%
Kayne Anderson Renewable Infras I
JENRX58.93-0.75
-1.26%
Jensen Quality Growth R
DSPIX64.28-0.86
-1.32%
BNY Mellon Instl S&P 500 Stk Idx I
GCCAX19.63-0.39
-1.95%
GMO Climate Change R6
ECFGX23.53-0.57
-2.37%
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
-2.38%
BAM - PAX
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
APAM - PAX
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.66%
BN - PAX
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
TROW - PAX
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
BX - PAX
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-2.18%
PAX - VINP
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.38%
SAMG - VINP
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.90%
TROW - VINP
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.86%
BN - VINP
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
JHG - VINP
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
More