PAX
Price
$11.97
Change
-$0.31 (-2.52%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
68 days until earnings call
VINP
Price
$10.11
Change
-$0.20 (-1.94%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
607.7M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

PAX vs VINP

Header iconPAX vs VINP Comparison
Open Charts PAX vs VINPBanner chart's image
Patria Investments
Price$11.97
Change-$0.31 (-2.52%)
Volume$979.5K
Capitalization2.2B
Vinci Partners Investments
Price$10.11
Change-$0.20 (-1.94%)
Volume$68.05K
Capitalization607.7M
PAX vs VINP Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PAX vs. VINP commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PAX is a Hold and VINP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (PAX: $12.28 vs. VINP: $10.31)
Brand notoriety: PAX and VINP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PAX: 68% vs. VINP: 154%
Market capitalization -- PAX: $2.2B vs. VINP: $607.7M
PAX [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.2B. VINP’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $607.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PAX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVINP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VINP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PAX and VINP are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAX’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VINP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PAX’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VINP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than VINP.

Price Growth

PAX (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.46% price change this week, while VINP (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

VINP is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.70% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.2B) has a higher market cap than VINP($608M). PAX has higher P/E ratio than VINP: PAX (18.37) vs VINP (13.92). PAX YTD gains are higher at: 5.589 vs. VINP (2.383). VINP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 289M vs. PAX (143M). VINP has higher revenues than PAX: VINP (608M) vs PAX (307M).
PAXVINPPAX / VINP
Capitalization2.2B608M362%
EBITDA143M289M49%
Gain YTD5.5892.383235%
P/E Ratio18.3713.92132%
Revenue307M608M50%
Total Cash12.8MN/A-
Total Debt15.6MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAXVINP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VINP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FTCVX35.49N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Secs M
FFIDX99.11N/A
N/A
Fidelity
IIVAX26.49N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value A
BRIUX17.59N/A
N/A
Baron Real Estate Income R6
LIGNX11.73-0.01
-0.09%
Loomis Sayles International Growth N

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been loosely correlated with BK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
-0.93%
BK - PAX
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
CG - PAX
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
BN - PAX
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
SEIC - PAX
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
BAM - PAX
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
More

VINP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VINP has been loosely correlated with PAX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VINP jumps, then PAX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VINP
1D Price
Change %
VINP100%
-0.58%
PAX - VINP
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.93%
SEIC - VINP
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
TROW - VINP
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
IVZ - VINP
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.81%
JHG - VINP
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
More