It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
PBEGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePEYUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PBEGF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEYUF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
PBEGF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -0.30% price change this week, while PEYUF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -9.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +44.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.76%.
PBEGF is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2024.
The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
PBEGF | PEYUF | PBEGF / PEYUF | |
Capitalization | 239M | 1.5B | 16% |
EBITDA | 7.6M | 861M | 1% |
Gain YTD | -48.148 | 16.946 | -284% |
P/E Ratio | 27.40 | 5.27 | 519% |
Revenue | 41M | 1.64B | 3% |
Total Cash | 10.9M | 4.23M | 258% |
Total Debt | 26.8M | 839M | 3% |
PBEGF | PEYUF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 97 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 93 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PEYUF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBEGF (97). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBEGF’s over the last 12 months.
PEYUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PBEGF (93). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew significantly faster than PBEGF’s over the last 12 months.
PEYUF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as PBEGF (93). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew similarly to PBEGF’s over the last 12 months.
PEYUF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBEGF (93). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBEGF’s over the last 12 months.
PEYUF's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBEGF (100). This means that PEYUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBEGF’s over the last 12 months.
PBEGF | PEYUF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago73% | 1 day ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% | 1 day ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago62% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago77% | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago82% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 1 day ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago75% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago80% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PBEGF and PEYUF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBEGF and PEYUF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBEGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PBEGF | 100% | +6.38% | ||
PEYUF - PBEGF | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.73% | ||
PMOIF - PBEGF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PIFYF - PBEGF | 2% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
NRIS - PBEGF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
OIGLF - PBEGF | 1% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PEYUF has been closely correlated with TRMLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PEYUF jumps, then TRMLF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PEYUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PEYUF | 100% | -2.73% | ||
TRMLF - PEYUF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
CRLFF - PEYUF | 69% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
VRN - PEYUF | 67% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
AETUF - PEYUF | 66% Closely correlated | -3.04% | ||
SPGYF - PEYUF | 66% Closely correlated | -2.38% | ||
More |