PBKOF
Price
$16.02
Change
-$0.28 (-1.72%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
687.45M
PBTHF
Price
$0.53
Change
+$0.06 (+12.77%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
346.1M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBKOF vs PBTHF

Header iconPBKOF vs PBTHF Comparison
Open Charts PBKOF vs PBTHFBanner chart's image
Pollard Banknote
Price$16.02
Change-$0.28 (-1.72%)
Volume$100
Capitalization687.45M
PointsBet Holdings
Price$0.53
Change+$0.06 (+12.77%)
Volume$100
Capitalization346.1M
PBKOF vs PBTHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PBKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBKOF vs. PBTHF commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBKOF is a Hold and PBTHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (PBKOF: $16.02 vs. PBTHF: $0.40)
Brand notoriety: PBKOF and PBTHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBKOF: 38% vs. PBTHF: 4%
Market capitalization -- PBKOF: $687.45M vs. PBTHF: $346.1M
PBKOF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $687.45M. PBTHF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $346.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBKOF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePBTHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PBKOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PBTHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PBKOF is a better buy in the long-term than PBTHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBKOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PBTHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBKOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PBTHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PBTHF is a better buy in the short-term than PBKOF.

Price Growth

PBKOF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -1.72% price change this week, while PBTHF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -39.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.08% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBKOF($687M) has a higher market cap than PBTHF($346M). PBKOF YTD gains are higher at: -0.497 vs. PBTHF (-13.320). PBKOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 88.8M vs. PBTHF (-260.08M). PBTHF has more cash in the bank: 520M vs. PBKOF (0). PBTHF has less debt than PBKOF: PBTHF (17.7M) vs PBKOF (141M). PBKOF has higher revenues than PBTHF: PBKOF (511M) vs PBTHF (335M).
PBKOFPBTHFPBKOF / PBTHF
Capitalization687M346M199%
EBITDA88.8M-260.08M-34%
Gain YTD-0.497-13.3204%
P/E Ratio31.16N/A-
Revenue511M335M153%
Total Cash0520M-
Total Debt141M17.7M797%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBKOF vs PBTHF: Fundamental Ratings
PBKOF
PBTHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9189
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
6197
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5847
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5386
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBTHF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as PBKOF (30). This means that PBTHF’s stock grew similarly to PBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

PBKOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as PBTHF (100). This means that PBKOF’s stock grew similarly to PBTHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBKOF's SMR Rating (61) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBTHF (97). This means that PBKOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBTHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBTHF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as PBKOF (58). This means that PBTHF’s stock grew similarly to PBKOF’s over the last 12 months.

PBKOF's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBTHF (86). This means that PBKOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBTHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBKOFPBTHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBKOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PBTHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLYCX30.930.32
+1.05%
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Growth C
MCFOX5.46N/A
N/A
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Inv C
VTARX11.18N/A
N/A
Virtus Tactical Allocation R6
ADVGX13.48N/A
N/A
North Square Select Small Cap I
FBRNX86.26N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel I

PBKOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBKOF and NGCRF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBKOF and NGCRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBKOF
1D Price
Change %
PBKOF100%
N/A
NGCRF - PBKOF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - PBKOF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBTHF - PBKOF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYTCF - PBKOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYTCY - PBKOF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PBTHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBTHF and MCHVF have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBTHF and MCHVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBTHF
1D Price
Change %
PBTHF100%
N/A
MCHVF - PBTHF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.38%
FLUT - PBTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.81%
RANKF - PBTHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYTCY - PBTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBKOF - PBTHF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More