PBMLF
Price
$0.93
Change
+$0.04 (+4.49%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.74M
PEMSF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
1.02M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBMLF vs PEMSF

Header iconPBMLF vs PEMSF Comparison
Open Charts PBMLF vs PEMSFBanner chart's image
Pacific Booker Minerals
Price$0.93
Change+$0.04 (+4.49%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization7.74M
Pacific Empire Minerals
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$142K
Capitalization1.02M
PBMLF vs PEMSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBMLF vs. PEMSF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBMLF is a Hold and PEMSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PBMLF: $0.93 vs. PEMSF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: PBMLF and PEMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBMLF: 38% vs. PEMSF: 136%
Market capitalization -- PBMLF: $7.74M vs. PEMSF: $1.02M
PBMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.74M. PEMSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePEMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PBMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PEMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PEMSF is a better buy in the long-term than PBMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBMLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PEMSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PEMSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PEMSF is a better buy in the short-term than PBMLF.

Price Growth

PBMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +31.33% price change this week, while PEMSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBMLF($7.74M) has a higher market cap than PEMSF($1.02M). PBMLF YTD gains are higher at: 154.261 vs. PEMSF (4.717). PEMSF (-864.98K) and PBMLF (-906.77K) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . PBMLF has more cash in the bank: 404K vs. PEMSF (338K). PBMLF (0) and PEMSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PBMLFPEMSFPBMLF / PEMSF
Capitalization7.74M1.02M757%
EBITDA-906.77K-864.98K105%
Gain YTD154.2614.7173,270%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash404K338K120%
Total DebtN/A43.4K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBMLF vs PEMSF: Fundamental Ratings
PBMLF
PEMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9245
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3748
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEMSF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBMLF (97). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PBMLF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PEMSF (48). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew similarly to PEMSF’s over the last 12 months.

PBMLF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PEMSF (100). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew similarly to PEMSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBMLFPEMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PEMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AREC0.870.04
+4.39%
American Resources Corp
MNTK2.710.08
+3.04%
Montauk Renewables
BAM56.811.27
+2.29%
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd
CENTA32.430.04
+0.12%
Central Garden & Pet Company
UPC3.70-0.12
-3.14%
Universe Pharmaceuticals Inc

PBMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBMLF and DBLVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBMLF and DBLVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBMLF
1D Price
Change %
PBMLF100%
+3.35%
DBLVF - PBMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
ORMNF - PBMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PALAF - PBMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
PEMSF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGEZF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
More

PEMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PEMSF and TCKRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PEMSF and TCKRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEMSF
1D Price
Change %
PEMSF100%
N/A
TCKRF - PEMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORRCF - PEMSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.40%
ORMNF - PEMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PALAF - PEMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
PGEZF - PEMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
More