PBMLF
Price
$0.58
Change
+$0.04 (+7.41%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
7.74M
PEMSF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.02M
Ad is loading...

PBMLF vs PEMSF

Header iconPBMLF vs PEMSF Comparison
Open Charts PBMLF vs PEMSFBanner chart's image
Pacific Booker Minerals
Price$0.58
Change+$0.04 (+7.41%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization7.74M
Pacific Empire Minerals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$227.35K
Capitalization1.02M
PBMLF vs PEMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBMLF vs. PEMSF commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBMLF is a Hold and PEMSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (PBMLF: $0.58 vs. PEMSF: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: PBMLF and PEMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBMLF: 69% vs. PEMSF: 198%
Market capitalization -- PBMLF: $7.74M vs. PEMSF: $1.02M
PBMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.74M. PEMSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePEMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PBMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PEMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PBMLF and PEMSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

PBMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +7.90% price change this week, while PEMSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +36.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.92%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+0.03% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBMLF($7.74M) has a higher market cap than PEMSF($1.02M). PBMLF YTD gains are higher at: 60.445 vs. PEMSF (28.774). PEMSF (-864.98K) and PBMLF (-906.77K) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . PBMLF has more cash in the bank: 404K vs. PEMSF (338K). PBMLF (0) and PEMSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PBMLFPEMSFPBMLF / PEMSF
Capitalization7.74M1.02M757%
EBITDA-906.77K-864.98K105%
Gain YTD60.44528.774210%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash404K338K120%
Total DebtN/A43.4K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBMLF vs PEMSF: Fundamental Ratings
PBMLF
PEMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4738
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PEMSF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (97). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMSF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (99). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMSF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (47). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PEMSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PEMSF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGJQX16.59-0.16
-0.96%
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure R6
FBKFX16.24-0.18
-1.10%
Fidelity Balanced K6
CIGRX21.37-0.32
-1.48%
Calamos International Growth A
PGORX65.26-1.61
-2.41%
Putnam Large Cap Growth R
PLCIX61.10-1.52
-2.43%
Voya Large-Cap Growth I

PBMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBMLF and DBLVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBMLF and DBLVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBMLF
1D Price
Change %
PBMLF100%
N/A
DBLVF - PBMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
OIIIF - PBMLF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORMNF - PBMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
+11.90%
PALAF - PBMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
PEMSF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-2.15%
More

PEMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PEMSF and TCKRF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PEMSF and TCKRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PEMSF
1D Price
Change %
PEMSF100%
-2.15%
TCKRF - PEMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORRCF - PEMSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-8.06%
ORMNF - PEMSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+11.90%
PALAF - PEMSF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.11%
PGEZF - PEMSF
1%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More