PBMLF
Price
$0.93
Change
+$0.04 (+4.49%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.74M
PGEZF
Price
$0.17
Change
+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
29.75M
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBMLF vs PGEZF

Header iconPBMLF vs PGEZF Comparison
Open Charts PBMLF vs PGEZFBanner chart's image
Pacific Booker Minerals
Price$0.93
Change+$0.04 (+4.49%)
Volume$1.55K
Capitalization7.74M
STILLWATER CRITICAL MINERALS
Price$0.17
Change+$0.02 (+13.33%)
Volume$357.22K
Capitalization29.75M
PBMLF vs PGEZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGEZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBMLF vs. PGEZF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBMLF is a Hold and PGEZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (PBMLF: $0.93 vs. PGEZF: $0.17)
Brand notoriety: PBMLF and PGEZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBMLF: 38% vs. PGEZF: 84%
Market capitalization -- PBMLF: $7.74M vs. PGEZF: $29.75M
PBMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $7.74M. PGEZF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $29.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBMLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePGEZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • PBMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PGEZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PBMLF and PGEZF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBMLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PGEZF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBMLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PGEZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PGEZF is a better buy in the short-term than PBMLF.

Price Growth

PBMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +31.33% price change this week, while PGEZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +12.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PGEZF($29.7M) has a higher market cap than PBMLF($7.74M). PBMLF YTD gains are higher at: 154.261 vs. PGEZF (98.188). PBMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -906.77K vs. PGEZF (-4.58M). PGEZF has more cash in the bank: 504K vs. PBMLF (404K). PBMLF (0) and PGEZF (0) have equivalent revenues.
PBMLFPGEZFPBMLF / PGEZF
Capitalization7.74M29.7M26%
EBITDA-906.77K-4.58M20%
Gain YTD154.26198.188157%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash404K504K80%
Total DebtN/A50K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBMLF vs PGEZF: Fundamental Ratings
PBMLF
PGEZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10098
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBMLF's Valuation (97) in the null industry is in the same range as PGEZF (99). This means that PBMLF’s stock grew similarly to PGEZF’s over the last 12 months.

PGEZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PGEZF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PGEZF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PGEZF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PGEZF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (37). This means that PGEZF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

PGEZF's P/E Growth Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as PBMLF (100). This means that PGEZF’s stock grew similarly to PBMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBMLFPGEZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PGEZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KKR138.604.07
+3.03%
KKR & Co
SAFT77.481.16
+1.52%
Safety Insurance Group
RVP0.650.01
+1.15%
Retractable Technologies
DDL2.080.02
+0.97%
Dingdong (Cayman) Limited
AMG201.450.95
+0.47%
Affiliated Managers Group

PBMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBMLF and DBLVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBMLF and DBLVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBMLF
1D Price
Change %
PBMLF100%
+3.35%
DBLVF - PBMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
ORMNF - PBMLF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PALAF - PBMLF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
PEMSF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PGEZF - PBMLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
More

PGEZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PGEZF and SLVDF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PGEZF and SLVDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PGEZF
1D Price
Change %
PGEZF100%
+14.75%
SLVDF - PGEZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
LUNMF - PGEZF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.35%
OMZNF - PGEZF
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
FCX - PGEZF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
CSCCF - PGEZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
More