PBNNF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.05 (+25.00%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
10.14B
RSNHF
Price
$10.17
Change
+$1.44 (+16.49%)
Updated
Aug 11 closing price
Capitalization
23.53B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PBNNF vs RSNHF

Header iconPBNNF vs RSNHF Comparison
Open Charts PBNNF vs RSNHFBanner chart's image
PT Bank Negara Indonesia TBK
Price$0.25
Change+$0.05 (+25.00%)
Volume$332
Capitalization10.14B
Resona Holdings
Price$10.17
Change+$1.44 (+16.49%)
Volume$86
Capitalization23.53B
PBNNF vs RSNHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PBNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PBNNF vs. RSNHF commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBNNF is a Buy and RSNHF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PBNNF: $0.25 vs. RSNHF: $10.17)
Brand notoriety: PBNNF and RSNHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PBNNF: 1% vs. RSNHF: 16%
Market capitalization -- PBNNF: $10.14B vs. RSNHF: $23.53B
PBNNF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $10.14B. RSNHF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $23.53B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PBNNF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileRSNHF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PBNNF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • RSNHF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both PBNNF and RSNHF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PBNNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RSNHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PBNNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RSNHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both PBNNF and RSNHF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

PBNNF (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RSNHF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RSNHF($23.5B) has a higher market cap than PBNNF($10.1B). RSNHF has higher P/E ratio than PBNNF: RSNHF (16.25) vs PBNNF (7.19). RSNHF YTD gains are higher at: 35.672 vs. PBNNF (9.031). RSNHF has less debt than PBNNF: RSNHF (5.28T) vs PBNNF (65.68T). PBNNF has higher revenues than RSNHF: PBNNF (61.56T) vs RSNHF (838B).
PBNNFRSNHFPBNNF / RSNHF
Capitalization10.1B23.5B43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.03135.67225%
P/E Ratio7.1916.2544%
Revenue61.56T838B7,346%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt65.68T5.28T1,245%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PBNNF vs RSNHF: Fundamental Ratings
PBNNF
RSNHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4536
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
126
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4342
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8230
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PBNNF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RSNHF (81). This means that PBNNF’s stock grew significantly faster than RSNHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBNNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as RSNHF (26). This means that PBNNF’s stock grew similarly to RSNHF’s over the last 12 months.

PBNNF's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as RSNHF (1). This means that PBNNF’s stock grew similarly to RSNHF’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as PBNNF (43). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew similarly to PBNNF’s over the last 12 months.

RSNHF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PBNNF (82). This means that RSNHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PBNNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PBNNFRSNHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PBNNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RSNHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPLB21.240.03
+0.14%
NYLI MacKay Core Plus Bond ETF
GOF14.85N/A
N/A
Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund
ELQD82.89N/A
N/A
iShares ESG Advanced Inv Grd Corp Bd ETF
BWZ27.61-0.16
-0.58%
SPDR® Blmbg ST Intrn TrsBd ETF
HUSV39.87-0.41
-1.02%
First Trust Hrzn MgdVolatil Domestic ETF

PBNNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PBNNF and EFSI have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PBNNF and EFSI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PBNNF
1D Price
Change %
PBNNF100%
N/A
EFSI - PBNNF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
MTPOF - PBNNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
RSNHF - PBNNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBAM - PBNNF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
PEBC - PBNNF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
More

RSNHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RSNHF and CDAB have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RSNHF and CDAB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RSNHF
1D Price
Change %
RSNHF100%
N/A
CDAB - RSNHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
BNCDY - RSNHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTPOF - RSNHF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.05%
PBNNF - RSNHF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPERF - RSNHF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.22%
More