Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PBW vs TAN
PBW vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts PBW vs TAN
PBW vs TAN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PBW vs. TAN commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PBW is a Hold and TAN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 1.29B vs. PBW (405M). PBW has a higher annual dividend yield than TAN: PBW (9.747) vs TAN (0.407). PBW was incepted earlier than TAN: PBW (21 years) vs TAN (18 years). PBW (0.64) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.70). PBW has a higher turnover TAN (41.00) vs TAN (41.00).
| PBW | TAN | PBW / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 9.747 | 0.407 | 2,394% |
| Net Assets | 405M | 1.29B | 32% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.70 | 91% |
| Turnover | 65.00 | 41.00 | 159% |
| Yield | 1.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PBW | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 20 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
PBW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PBW has been closely correlated with AMRC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PBW jumps, then AMRC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PBW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBW | 100% | +1.84% | ||
| AMRC - PBW | 71% Closely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| JOBY - PBW | 68% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| AMPX - PBW | 67% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| MP - PBW | 66% Loosely correlated | +9.10% | ||
| BE - PBW | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.51% | ||
More | ||||
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been loosely correlated with BEEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then BEEM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | -0.82% | ||
| BEEM - TAN | 49% Loosely correlated | +15.44% | ||
| FAST - TAN | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.18% | ||
| JKS - TAN | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 14% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| DQ - TAN | 9% Poorly correlated | -9.35% | ||
More | ||||