Ad is loading...
PCAFX vs RIDBX
PCAFX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts PCAFX vs RIDBX
Prospector Capital Appreciation
Price$22.34
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets42.28M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$25.04
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.21B
PCAFX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCAFX vs. RIDBX commentary
May 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCAFX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. PCAFX (42.3M). RIDBX pays higher dividends than PCAFX: RIDBX (3.17) vs PCAFX (0.52). PCAFX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: PCAFX (18 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). PCAFX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.36). RIDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 92.00 vs. PCAFX (30.00). RIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCAFX: RIDBX (250) vs PCAFX (10000). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. PCAFX (0.63). PCAFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.37 vs. RIDBX (37.04).
| PCAFX | RIDBX | PCAFX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.36 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.36 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.995 | 4.708 | 21% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 42.3M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 3.17 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.63 | 8.80 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.36 | 13.86 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.37 | 37.04 | 112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.72 | 30.83 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...