Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCAFX vs RIDBX
PCAFX vs RIDBX Comparison
Open Charts PCAFX vs RIDBX
Prospector Capital Appreciation
Price$23.35
Change+$0.08 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.92M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R2
Price$27.08
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets138.71B
PCAFX vs RIDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCAFX vs. RIDBX commentary
Oct 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCAFX is a Buy and RIDBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDBX has more cash in the bank: 139B vs. PCAFX (43.9M). RIDBX pays higher dividends than PCAFX: RIDBX (2.90) vs PCAFX (0.49). PCAFX was incepted earlier than RIDBX: PCAFX (18 years) vs RIDBX (23 years). PCAFX (1.56) is less costly to investors than RIDBX (1.35). RIDBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCAFX: RIDBX (250) vs PCAFX (10000). RIDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. PCAFX (-1.20). RIDBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.97 vs. PCAFX (30.28).
| PCAFX | RIDBX | PCAFX / RIDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 1.35 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.56 | 1.35 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.199 | 14.267 | 36% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 43.9M | 139B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 2.90 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.20 | 9.31 | -13% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.46 | 34.38 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.28 | 36.97 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.95 | 48.14 | 118% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement