Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCBSX vs QGMNX
PCBSX vs QGMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCBSX vs. QGMNX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCBSX is a Hold and QGMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCBSX has more cash in the bank: 3.68B vs. QGMNX (597M). QGMNX pays higher dividends than PCBSX: QGMNX (1.50) vs PCBSX (0.00). PCBSX was incepted earlier than QGMNX: PCBSX (21 years) vs QGMNX (12 years). QGMNX (1.94) is less costly to investors than PCBSX (1.04). QGMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 141.00 vs. PCBSX (108.00). QGMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCBSX: QGMNX (2500) vs PCBSX (5000). QGMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.81 vs. PCBSX (7.33). PCBSX return over 5 years is better than : 28.18 vs. QGMNX (18.74).
| PCBSX | QGMNX | PCBSX / QGMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.70 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.04 | 1.94 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.007 | 5.202 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 2500 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.68B | 597M | 616% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.50 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.33 | 7.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.44 | -5.35 | -420% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.18 | 18.74 | 150% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.35 | 12.06 | 301% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers