Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCCEX vs PFIPX
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts PCCEX vs PFIPX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R6
Price$10.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.97M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.23B
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCCEX vs. PFIPX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCEX is a Buy and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.23B vs. PCCEX (562M). PCCEX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: PCCEX (3.53) vs PFIPX (2.54). PCCEX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: PCCEX (13 years) vs PFIPX (18 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCCEX (0.67). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PCCEX (0) and PFIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFIPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.89 vs. PCCEX (5.39). PCCEX (10.61) and PFIPX (10.38) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PCCEX | PFIPX | PCCEX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.064 | 2.537 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 562M | 2.23B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.53 | 2.54 | 139% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.39 | 5.89 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.79 | 11.62 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.61 | 10.38 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.70 | 22.58 | 105% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement