Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCCEX vs PFIPX
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison
Open Charts PCCEX vs PFIPX
Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Cnsrv R6
Price$11.02
Change-$0.02 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets570.32M
Principal SAM Flexible Income R3
Price$12.42
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
PCCEX vs PFIPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCCEX vs. PFIPX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCEX is a Buy and PFIPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFIPX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. PCCEX (570M). PCCEX pays higher dividends than PFIPX: PCCEX (3.22) vs PFIPX (2.49). PCCEX was incepted earlier than PFIPX: PCCEX (13 years) vs PFIPX (19 years). PFIPX (1.26) is less costly to investors than PCCEX (0.67). PCCEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 372.00 vs. PFIPX (19.80). PCCEX (0) and PFIPX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PFIPX (6.97) and PCCEX (6.83) have marching annual gain over last year. PFIPX (11.04) and PCCEX (10.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| PCCEX | PFIPX | PCCEX / PFIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 1.26 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.747 | 5.044 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 2.24B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 2.49 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.83 | 6.97 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.46 | 14.91 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 10.74 | 11.04 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.66 | 25.35 | 101% |