PCCYF
Price
$0.92
Change
-$0.01 (-1.08%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
204.52B
SNPMF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
85.58B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCCYF vs SNPMF

Header iconPCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison
Open Charts PCCYF vs SNPMFBanner chart's image
PetroChina
Price$0.92
Change-$0.01 (-1.08%)
Volume$26.63K
Capitalization204.52B
China Petroleum & Chemical
Price$0.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization85.58B
PCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCCYF vs. SNPMF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCYF is a Hold and SNPMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (PCCYF: $0.92 vs. SNPMF: $0.51)
Brand notoriety: PCCYF and SNPMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCCYF: 75% vs. SNPMF: 278%
Market capitalization -- PCCYF: $204.52B vs. SNPMF: $85.58B
PCCYF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $204.52B. SNPMF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $85.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $492.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $57.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCCYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNPMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCCYF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPMF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCCYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNPMF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the short-term than SNPMF.

Price Growth

PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -3.75% price change this week, while SNPMF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -5.56% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.66%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.27% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($205B) has a higher market cap than SNPMF($85.6B). SNPMF has higher P/E ratio than PCCYF: SNPMF (12.38) vs PCCYF (7.51). PCCYF YTD gains are higher at: 19.318 vs. SNPMF (-3.919). PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 486B vs. SNPMF (188B). PCCYF has more cash in the bank: 294B vs. SNPMF (162B). PCCYF has less debt than SNPMF: PCCYF (369B) vs SNPMF (530B). SNPMF (2.91T) and PCCYF (2.83T) have equivalent revenues.
PCCYFSNPMFPCCYF / SNPMF
Capitalization205B85.6B239%
EBITDA486B188B259%
Gain YTD19.318-3.919-493%
P/E Ratio7.5112.3861%
Revenue2.83T2.91T97%
Total Cash294B162B181%
Total Debt369B530B70%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCCYF vs SNPMF: Fundamental Ratings
PCCYF
SNPMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5929
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
12
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3484
SMR RATING
1..100
69100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5176
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2317
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCYF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (22). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPMF (84). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (100). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (76). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNPMF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (23). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCCYFSNPMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EXOZ14.57-0.03
-0.23%
eXoZymes Inc
DLTR94.03-1.87
-1.95%
Dollar Tree
ULH23.51-0.47
-1.96%
Universal Logistics Holdings
VKTX25.09-1.54
-5.78%
Viking Therapeutics
CVR10.15-0.95
-8.56%
Chicago Rivet & Machine Co

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
-1.21%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
More

SNPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPMF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPMF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPMF
1D Price
Change %
SNPMF100%
+0.67%
PCCYF - SNPMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
WDGJY - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STOHF - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TTFNF - SNPMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.40%
SEGYY - SNPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More