PCCYF
Price
$0.73
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
SNPMF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

PCCYF vs SNPMF

Header iconPCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison
Open Charts PCCYF vs SNPMFBanner chart's image
PetroChina
Price$0.73
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$356.51K
CapitalizationN/A
China Petroleum & Chemical
Price$0.53
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
PCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCCYF vs. SNPMF commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCYF is a Hold and SNPMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (PCCYF: $0.73 vs. SNPMF: $0.53)
Brand notoriety: PCCYF and SNPMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCCYF: 31% vs. SNPMF: 44%
Market capitalization -- PCCYF: $195.67B vs. SNPMF: $96.72B
PCCYF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $195.67B. SNPMF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $96.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCCYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPMF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCCYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCCYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNPMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the short-term than SNPMF.

Price Growth

PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -0.68% price change this week, while SNPMF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -2.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -2.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-2.38% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($196B) has a higher market cap than SNPMF($96.7B). SNPMF has higher P/E ratio than PCCYF: SNPMF (7.41) vs PCCYF (6.11). PCCYF YTD gains are higher at: 11.942 vs. SNPMF (7.753). PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478B vs. SNPMF (218B). PCCYF has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. SNPMF (179B). SNPMF (448B) and PCCYF (451B) have identical debt. SNPMF (3.34T) and PCCYF (3.19T) have equivalent revenues.
PCCYFSNPMFPCCYF / SNPMF
Capitalization196B96.7B203%
EBITDA478B218B219%
Gain YTD11.9427.753154%
P/E Ratio6.117.4182%
Revenue3.19T3.34T96%
Total Cash306B179B171%
Total Debt451B448B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCCYF vs SNPMF: Fundamental Ratings
PCCYF
SNPMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1222
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
27
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44100
SMR RATING
1..100
6576
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7854
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5095

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCYF's Valuation (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (27). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPMF (100). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (76). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (57). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNPMF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (78). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCCYFSNPMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TDVI24.450.32
+1.34%
FT Vest Tech Div Trgt Inc ETF
UJAN38.850.02
+0.06%
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buff ETF™ Jan
ESIX31.510.01
+0.04%
SPDR S&P SmallCap 600 ESG ETF
GSSC69.25-0.10
-0.15%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
TOTL39.32-0.12
-0.30%
SPDR® DoubleLine® Total Return Tact ETF

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
+0.14%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.93%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
More

SNPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPMF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPMF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPMF
1D Price
Change %
SNPMF100%
+0.12%
PCCYF - SNPMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
WDGJY - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STOHF - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
TTFNF - SNPMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.35%
SEGYY - SNPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More