PCCYF
Price
$0.93
Change
+$0.01 (+1.09%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
195.67B
SNPMF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.01 (-1.69%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
96.72B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCCYF vs SNPMF

Header iconPCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison
Open Charts PCCYF vs SNPMFBanner chart's image
PetroChina
Price$0.93
Change+$0.01 (+1.09%)
Volume$112.57K
Capitalization195.67B
China Petroleum & Chemical
Price$0.58
Change-$0.01 (-1.69%)
Volume$50.7K
Capitalization96.72B
PCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCCYF vs. SNPMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCYF is a Hold and SNPMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (PCCYF: $0.93 vs. SNPMF: $0.58)
Brand notoriety: PCCYF and SNPMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCCYF: 102% vs. SNPMF: 303%
Market capitalization -- PCCYF: $195.67B vs. SNPMF: $96.72B
PCCYF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $195.67B. SNPMF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $96.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCCYF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SNPMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCCYF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNPMF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCCYF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNPMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNPMF is a better buy in the short-term than PCCYF.

Price Growth

PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +4.94% price change this week, while SNPMF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +13.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

SNPMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.59% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($196B) has a higher market cap than SNPMF($96.7B). SNPMF has higher P/E ratio than PCCYF: SNPMF (7.41) vs PCCYF (6.11). PCCYF YTD gains are higher at: 20.779 vs. SNPMF (9.420). PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478B vs. SNPMF (218B). PCCYF has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. SNPMF (179B). SNPMF (448B) and PCCYF (451B) have identical debt. SNPMF (3.34T) and PCCYF (3.19T) have equivalent revenues.
PCCYFSNPMFPCCYF / SNPMF
Capitalization196B96.7B203%
EBITDA478B218B219%
Gain YTD20.7799.420221%
P/E Ratio6.117.4182%
Revenue3.19T3.34T96%
Total Cash306B179B171%
Total Debt451B448B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCCYF vs SNPMF: Fundamental Ratings
PCCYF
SNPMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6186
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3561
SMR RATING
1..100
6576
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4448
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5328
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCCYF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (26). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (61). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (65) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (76). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (48). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNPMF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (53). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCCYFSNPMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
59%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCCYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SST7.510.42
+5.92%
System1
CLS170.226.24
+3.81%
Celestica
MEOH34.270.76
+2.27%
Methanex Corp
OTRK0.58N/A
N/A
Ontrak Inc
GNK16.17-0.01
-0.06%
GENCO SHIPPING & TRADING Ltd

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
+1.09%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.25%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More

SNPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPMF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPMF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPMF
1D Price
Change %
SNPMF100%
N/A
PCCYF - SNPMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.09%
WDGJY - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STOHF - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TTFNF - SNPMF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.58%
SEGYY - SNPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More