PCCYF
Price
$0.77
Change
-$0.04 (-4.94%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
195.67B
SNPMF
Price
$0.51
Change
-$0.01 (-1.92%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
96.72B
Ad is loading...

PCCYF vs SNPMF

Header iconPCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison
Open Charts PCCYF vs SNPMFBanner chart's image
PetroChina
Price$0.77
Change-$0.04 (-4.94%)
Volume$17.89K
Capitalization195.67B
China Petroleum & Chemical
Price$0.51
Change-$0.01 (-1.92%)
Volume$34K
Capitalization96.72B
PCCYF vs SNPMF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCCYF vs. SNPMF commentary
Apr 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCCYF is a Hold and SNPMF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 05, 2025
Stock price -- (PCCYF: $0.81 vs. SNPMF: $0.52)
Brand notoriety: PCCYF and SNPMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCCYF: 37% vs. SNPMF: 93%
Market capitalization -- PCCYF: $195.67B vs. SNPMF: $96.72B
PCCYF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $195.67B. SNPMF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $96.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCCYF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNPMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • PCCYF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNPMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PCCYF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPMF.

Price Growth

PCCYF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +0.96% price change this week, while SNPMF (@Integrated Oil) price change was -4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -6.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (-6.76% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCCYF($196B) has a higher market cap than SNPMF($96.7B). SNPMF has higher P/E ratio than PCCYF: SNPMF (7.41) vs PCCYF (6.11). PCCYF YTD gains are higher at: 4.896 vs. SNPMF (-2.035). PCCYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 478B vs. SNPMF (218B). PCCYF has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. SNPMF (179B). SNPMF (448B) and PCCYF (451B) have identical debt. SNPMF (3.34T) and PCCYF (3.19T) have equivalent revenues.
PCCYFSNPMFPCCYF / SNPMF
Capitalization196B96.7B203%
EBITDA478B218B219%
Gain YTD4.896-2.035-241%
P/E Ratio6.117.4182%
Revenue3.19T3.34T96%
Total Cash306B179B171%
Total Debt451B448B101%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCCYF vs SNPMF: Fundamental Ratings
PCCYF
SNPMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
18
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3275
SMR RATING
1..100
6476
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4557
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5727
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNPMF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (19). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNPMF (75). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's SMR Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (76). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

PCCYF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (57). This means that PCCYF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNPMF's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is in the same range as PCCYF (57). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew similarly to PCCYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUXX20.360.04
+0.17%
Strive Enhanced Income Short MaturityETF
SGOL29.64-0.17
-0.57%
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
RXL47.08-0.74
-1.55%
ProShares Ultra Health Care
DIEM26.75-0.49
-1.78%
Franklin Emerging Mkt Core Div TltIdxETF
PAPR34.98-0.84
-2.36%
Innovator U.S. Equity PowerBffrETF™-Apr

PCCYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCCYF and SHEL have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCCYF and SHEL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCCYF
1D Price
Change %
PCCYF100%
-4.98%
SHEL - PCCYF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.06%
EQNR - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
SNPMF - PCCYF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
EC - PCCYF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.54%
BP - PCCYF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.31%
More

SNPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPMF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPMF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPMF
1D Price
Change %
SNPMF100%
-4.26%
PCCYF - SNPMF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.98%
WDGJY - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-21.54%
STOHF - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.12%
TTFNF - SNPMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
SEGYY - SNPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More