Ad is loading...
PCLAX vs RYMBX
PCLAX vs RYMBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLAX vs RYMBX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS® Strategy A
Price$5.79
Change-$0.07 (-1.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.68B
Rydex Commodities Strategy H
Price$138.97
Change-$3.23 (-2.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.53M
PCLAX vs RYMBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLAX vs. RYMBX commentary
Apr 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLAX is a Hold and RYMBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCLAX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. RYMBX (3.53M). PCLAX pays higher dividends than RYMBX: PCLAX (8.17) vs RYMBX (0.00). PCLAX was incepted earlier than RYMBX: PCLAX (15 years) vs RYMBX (20 years). RYMBX (1.80) is less costly to investors than PCLAX (1.45). PCLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYMBX: PCLAX (1000) vs RYMBX (2500). PCLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -8.37 vs. RYMBX (-10.09). PCLAX return over 5 years is better than : 150.49 vs. RYMBX (-8.39).
| PCLAX | RYMBX | PCLAX / RYMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.28 | 1.61 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 1.80 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.626 | -5.578 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 1000 | - |
| Net Assets | 4.68B | 3.53M | 132,606% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.17 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.37 | -10.09 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.28 | -24.15 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 150.49 | -8.39 | -1,794% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.70 | -68.27 | -89% |