PCLB
Price
$32.00
Change
+$0.30 (+0.95%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
17.84M
SCGLF
Price
$63.84
Change
-$1.96 (-2.98%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
22.18B
Interact to see
Advertisement

PCLB vs SCGLF

Header iconPCLB vs SCGLF Comparison
Open Charts PCLB vs SCGLFBanner chart's image
Pinnacle Bancshares
Price$32.00
Change+$0.30 (+0.95%)
Volume$100
Capitalization17.84M
Societe Generale
Price$63.84
Change-$1.96 (-2.98%)
Volume$2
Capitalization22.18B
PCLB vs SCGLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
PCLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
PCLB vs. SCGLF commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLB is a Hold and SCGLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (PCLB: $32.00 vs. SCGLF: $63.84)
Brand notoriety: PCLB and SCGLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: PCLB: 14% vs. SCGLF: 0%
Market capitalization -- PCLB: $17.84M vs. SCGLF: $22.18B
PCLB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $17.84M. SCGLF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $22.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

PCLB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSCGLF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • PCLB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SCGLF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCGLF is a better buy in the long-term than PCLB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PCLB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCGLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • PCLB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • SCGLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SCGLF is a better buy in the short-term than PCLB.

Price Growth

PCLB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while SCGLF (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.19%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.51% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCGLF($22.2B) has a higher market cap than PCLB($17.8M). SCGLF YTD gains are higher at: 131.422 vs. PCLB (16.501). PCLB has less debt than SCGLF: PCLB (9.39M) vs SCGLF (154B). SCGLF has higher revenues than PCLB: SCGLF (38.6B) vs PCLB (8.19M).
PCLBSCGLFPCLB / SCGLF
Capitalization17.8M22.2B0%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD16.501131.42213%
P/E RatioN/A15.22-
Revenue8.19M38.6B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt9.39M154B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PCLB vs SCGLF: Fundamental Ratings
PCLB
SCGLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8587
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6818
SMR RATING
1..100
305
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1651
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SCGLF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PCLB (86). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew significantly faster than PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCLB (68). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as PCLB (30). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

SCGLF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as PCLB (53). This means that SCGLF’s stock grew similarly to PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

PCLB's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SCGLF (51). This means that PCLB’s stock grew somewhat faster than SCGLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PCLBSCGLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PCLB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCGLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NYT61.958.33
+15.54%
New York Times Co
HSHP7.230.13
+1.83%
Himalaya Shipping Ltd
HG21.550.37
+1.75%
Hamilton Insurance Group Ltd
CTK.X0.3160400.001630
+0.52%
Shentu cryptocurrency
FIRO.X0.578983-0.010974
-1.86%
Firo cryptocurrency

PCLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCLB and SCGLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCLB and SCGLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCLB
1D Price
Change %
PCLB100%
N/A
SCGLF - PCLB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCYY - PCLB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBBW - PCLB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUTNY - PCLB
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
MNAT - PCLB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCGLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCGLF has been loosely correlated with KBCSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCGLF jumps, then KBCSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCGLF
1D Price
Change %
SCGLF100%
N/A
KBCSY - SCGLF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
PCLB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FVCB - SCGLF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
BNPQF - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.75%
BNPQY - SCGLF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
More