Ad is loading...
PCLCX vs RGAFX
PCLCX vs RGAFX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGAFX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$16.21
Change+$0.25 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets670.72M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5
Price$67.19
Change+$1.06 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
PCLCX vs RGAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGAFX commentary
Apr 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Buy and RGAFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. PCLCX (671M). RGAFX pays higher dividends than PCLCX: RGAFX (0.66) vs PCLCX (0.00). PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGAFX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGAFX (23 years). PCLCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than RGAFX (0.34). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGAFX (25.00). RGAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGAFX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.95 vs. PCLCX (-12.11). RGAFX return over 5 years is better than : 48.89 vs. PCLCX (-23.70).
| PCLCX | RGAFX | PCLCX / RGAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 0.34 | 259% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.34 | 268% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.726 | -9.715 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 671M | 261B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.66 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.11 | -4.95 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.98 | 7.58 | -396% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.70 | 48.89 | -48% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.23 | 52.40 | -73% |