Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGEBX
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGEBX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$19.30
Change-$0.06 (-0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets773.88M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$80.33
Change-$0.02 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.99B
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Aug 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. PCLCX (774M). PCLCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than PCLCX (0.91). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGEBX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.88 vs. PCLCX (8.04). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.18 vs. PCLCX (-31.04).
| PCLCX | RGEBX | PCLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.09 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.080 | 12.444 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 774M | 325B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.04 | 16.88 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.42 | 38.79 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.04 | 39.18 | -79% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.14 | 77.72 | -35% |