Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
PCLCX vs RGEBX
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts PCLCX vs RGEBX
PACE Large Co Growth Equity P
Price$19.45
Change-$0.20 (-1.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets750.96M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$81.95
Change-$0.57 (-0.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.73B
PCLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
PCLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is PCLCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 330B vs. PCLCX (751M). PCLCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . PCLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: PCLCX (30 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than PCLCX (0.91). PCLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than PCLCX: RGEBX (250) vs PCLCX (10000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.39 vs. PCLCX (-1.26). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.69 vs. PCLCX (-34.90).
| PCLCX | RGEBX | PCLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.09 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.09 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.684 | 14.712 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 250 | 4,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 751M | 330B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.26 | 6.39 | -20% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.40 | 59.35 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.90 | 29.69 | -118% |
| Returns for 10 years | -26.02 | 80.59 | -32% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement